If it wasn’t for science, art and tech for their own sake we would still be on the trees gathering bananas
Not sure what you're referring to with science at all.
The worst people in the world already know this and run our industry. There's no reason we have to accept them.
> Unlike in the modern dating process, they cannot get to know a potential partner intimately before deciding whether or not to commit to a relationship.
Does intimacy somehow lend knowledge of whether someone's looking for a long term relationship?
> Tinder data shows that men like 10 times more profiles than women do and that 1 in 50 of their likes leads to a match versus 2 out of 5 for women. Faced with many men happy to date them, women have to identify the ones who may be willing to invest in a long-term relationship.
This seems to be saying that men send out lots of likes because they want to play around... but I thought men sent out lots of likes because if they didn't they wouldn't even get a single match, which doesn't say anything about interest in long term relationships.
Deleted Comment
He did recant any notion of Ukrainians being Russian. He also asserted ukrainians Right to independent self-governing.
What about:
- curiosity (much of science, mathematics, etc.)
- artistic expression (musical instruments, demoscene)
- fortunate accidents (penicillin)
- just tinkering around (all sorts of inventions)
- play and fun (many non-commercial computer games)
- communication (telegraph, telephone, email, ...)
- self-expression (blogs)
- being dissatisfied with something and trying to change it (many more inventions)
- basic needs (advances in food, shelter, medicine...)
- trying to gain a military advantage (all sorts of weaponry and defenses)
- exploration (e.g. traveling to the bottom of the ocean, or landing on the moon)
- ideology/philosophy/religion (GNU and free software; cathedrals; pyramids)
etc.
At the end of the day much of technology is motivated by human needs, interests, desires, fears, etc.
OP's move from tech to comedy writing shows that interest or passion can be powerful motivators.
Also, a military advantage is an economic one, there's no real difference between the concepts.