Readit NewsDeleted Comment
upstream (outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com.) temporary error: Unknown error: transient error (451): 4.7.650 The mail server [104.30.10.49] has been temporarily rate limited due to IP reputation
I don't know how to deal with this so right now you can contact me on n0vella@outlook.com
Good luck and congrats on launch.
Little point. It'll be like facebook's opt-out and only cover things you post/update going forward. Everything you've already posted has already been slurped into the training set and won't be taken out and the model(s) retrained.
The only way to show disapproval in this sort of behaviour that they'll feel is to stop using services that use auto-opt-in for anything, and not enough people are likely to do that for it to be effective.
Resolving theft is the government’s job, moving stuff is Canadian Pacific’s job.
The onus lies on the government to have sufficient personnel and processes to have the stolen item recovered quickly.
If the Canadian Pacific police is contacted, told "Canadian Pacific has my stolen car, these are the case numbers with 2 different police services, and here is the exact container the car is in", I don't see how the right response is do nothing.
But if Canadian Pacific was told they have stolen property & continued to ship it - why are they not held responsible? And if exact storage container was spotted, why didn't the railway police try harder to trace the shipper?
It goes “got it - we’ll send a spoon up”.
It seems absurdly simple but was pretty impressed at a real implementation of AI that just worked (in what I’d consider an edge case).