There is no mechanism in crypto to reject incoming funds, and all the top addresses are public.
Anyone could easily send the top 100,000 wallets “tainted” crypto.
1. Https://grin.mw
there is zero consensus on fair and therefore it is impossible to have a fair launch
all outcomes result in consolidation unless inflation/dilution is extremely high and uninteresting
Bitcoin was born into a unique environment. The world did not know what to think, and largely ignored it, so it was able to spread organically for years, detached from any notion it would ever be worth anything. Because it had no value, it could grow without having to worry about these kinds of attacks. Only once it spread far enough did it begin to take on economic value and an exchange rate, reaching one penny and beyond.
Airdrops these days do the exact opposite. They're premined, listed day 1 on exchanges, and the creators try to pump the exchange rate in order to finance later development. The entire process is corrupted by users viewing projects through an economic lens, and creators trying to extract value before delivering value. Now that the cat is out of the bag, it's likely the conditions of bitcoin's creation will never happen again.
vs
> (literally the killer) feature
A "killer feature" is a phrase with its own meaning so we can treat it as an atom and apply modifiers to it. The order of operations matters, and I posit that the OP placed their imaginary parentheses as I did in my first example.
If your body is not damaged enough. It would mean a lot of people would become really risk averse. If generalized it would fossilize a society really fast.