Readit News logoReadit News
aluminaient commented on What happened to the first cryogenically frozen humans?   bigthink.com/the-future/c... · Posted by u/fbn79
arkh · 3 years ago
> Immortality

If your body is not damaged enough. It would mean a lot of people would become really risk averse. If generalized it would fossilize a society really fast.

aluminaient · 3 years ago
You've repeated their point.
aluminaient commented on What happened to the first cryogenically frozen humans?   bigthink.com/the-future/c... · Posted by u/fbn79
trompetenaccoun · 3 years ago
All must be equal, then we will be free! Use violence if necessary, it will leads us right into utopia.

https://i.redd.it/0h112jbq7js91.png

aluminaient · 3 years ago
Naive to think otherwise.
aluminaient commented on Tornado Cash Dev Arrested   decrypt.co/107314/dutch-p... · Posted by u/internet_user
internet_user · 4 years ago
How long until you must be registered and licensed to write smart contracts?
aluminaient · 4 years ago
Or any code at all? This is an attack on open source software no matter how you cut it.
aluminaient commented on UN trade body calls for halting cryptocurrency rise in developing countries   news.un.org/en/story/2022... · Posted by u/matsemann
mateo1 · 4 years ago
It is naive to think the rise of cryptocurrencies will help anyone but large companies specialised at scamming retail investors, and of course criminal organisations. As bad as the IMF policies might be, this isn't the solution.
aluminaient · 4 years ago
What do you recommend? This seems like the singular usecase of cryptocurrency.
aluminaient commented on Dusting “Attack” via Tornado Cash to Public Wallets   etherscan.io/txsInternal?... · Posted by u/martialg
zionic · 4 years ago
This outcome was as obvious as it was inevitable.

There is no mechanism in crypto to reject incoming funds, and all the top addresses are public.

Anyone could easily send the top 100,000 wallets “tainted” crypto.

aluminaient · 4 years ago
Grin [1] requires interactivity between both parties to transact.

1. Https://grin.mw

aluminaient commented on Sybil attacks on airdrops   matt-rickard.com/sybil-at... · Posted by u/rckrd
yieldcrv · 4 years ago
people dont consider instamines any less unfair than premines

there is zero consensus on fair and therefore it is impossible to have a fair launch

all outcomes result in consolidation unless inflation/dilution is extremely high and uninteresting

aluminaient · 4 years ago
Grin wasnt instamined or premined. One new coin per second is mined forever starting day one. So it is pretty interesting and very high inflation and widely considered to be the most fair distribution to date.
aluminaient commented on Sybil attacks on airdrops   matt-rickard.com/sybil-at... · Posted by u/rckrd
game-of-throws · 4 years ago
I think at this stage it's impossible to fairly distribute a coin to new users.

Bitcoin was born into a unique environment. The world did not know what to think, and largely ignored it, so it was able to spread organically for years, detached from any notion it would ever be worth anything. Because it had no value, it could grow without having to worry about these kinds of attacks. Only once it spread far enough did it begin to take on economic value and an exchange rate, reaching one penny and beyond.

Airdrops these days do the exact opposite. They're premined, listed day 1 on exchanges, and the creators try to pump the exchange rate in order to finance later development. The entire process is corrupted by users viewing projects through an economic lens, and creators trying to extract value before delivering value. Now that the cat is out of the bag, it's likely the conditions of bitcoin's creation will never happen again.

aluminaient · 4 years ago
Are you saying you think bitcoin was fair? That seems hard to support.
aluminaient commented on I've started using Firefox and can never go back to Chrome   techradar.com/in/features... · Posted by u/p4bl0
turboponyy · 4 years ago
> literally the (killer feature)

vs

> (literally the killer) feature

A "killer feature" is a phrase with its own meaning so we can treat it as an atom and apply modifiers to it. The order of operations matters, and I posit that the OP placed their imaginary parentheses as I did in my first example.

aluminaient · 4 years ago
No. There is no such thing as a "literally killer feature" unless it is some feature that can cause death. A killer feature in this case is exclusively figurative and adding "literally" is wrong to do.
aluminaient commented on No, Bitcoin Is Not Going to Fail   hackernoon.com/no-bitcoin... · Posted by u/goindeep
t-3 · 4 years ago
If it actually takes that long, we have far bigger problems, because that means technological advance has halted or regressed. In that case, it will die suddenly whenever electricity goes up and price/coin goes down long enough that all non-criminal mining operations shut down and investors panic.
aluminaient · 4 years ago
How could that limit be reached faster with better technology?
aluminaient commented on Crimes against transhumanity   antipope.org/charlie/blog... · Posted by u/zdw
eddd-ddde · 4 years ago
What says you are not in a simulation right now ? Does it make any difference ?
aluminaient · 4 years ago
It would make a huge difference ta find out tomorrow all of this was simulated for some arbitrary end.

u/aluminaient

KarmaCake day16June 22, 2022View Original