Apple Users only. Responses are not necessarily indicative of how the respondents will actually behave in real life.
Honestly I find most studies based solely on self-reported data worthless.
What people say they’ll do/buy is often only loosely correlated with what actually happens.
See:
-YouTube thumbnail controversy, vs what people actually click on
-/r/apple and other comment section’s obsession with the commercially-failed mini lineup of iPhones
-everyone says ads don’t work on them, but ads work
I could go on
Realistically, P2P using giant rockets is a nothing but a pipe dream. Just straight forward things like weather proof this. The latest F9 launch had to be scrubbed two times due to unfavourable weather at the launch site, for example.
Now multiply that just that weather-risk by two, since the landing site also requires good conditions at the same time.
Then there's the "little things" like airspace closures, launch permissions, boarding procedures, the requirement for personal pressure suits (simple masks won't do in case of cabin pressure loss), etc.
The idea sounds so easy on paper, but there's a lot of good reasons that in over 60 years of crewed space flight, the idea hasn't even been demonstrated.
Fuck dang, time to cycle residential proxies.
That said, see sibling comments about fineness. In addition to being fine in the shiny variety, starship is a portly fellow. It will be able to land in anything less than a hurricane.