Readit NewsOH, its already been done!
Some people looking at this cruft may want it.
The Klein bottle guy sells, right?
My prompt for years has been:
: ▶
Python venvs are useful too if you have a shell for running the program and other shells that just happen to be within that directory.
But when they report on something, it's gone from the public view in a few weeks as the only place you could find it would be your own archive, assuming it goes back that far (and you wish to dedicate the space in your house), or a major library of which there are only a handful in the country that would maintain an indefinite archive.
Something more impactful than a report on another suspiciously "bungled" contract by a councillor would be to be able to see the other articles they've done on that person over the decades. Even if there was, say, a year-long delay in putting them in the archive, there's a difference between "Eyes passim" (doubly irritating as there's also no thematic index and hundreds of back issues you'd need to look in) and seeing the older reports in front of you.
2.5% of CO2 laden air (~50,000 ppm) + 97.5% fresh air (420 ppm) = 1640ppm.
1640 ppm of CO2 is very much into the 'feels drowsy and hard to concentrate' region.
When exercising, the tidal volumes are far higher (2-3L), and you breathe faster, so the lung air is at least twice as fresh as it was at rest, probably more, since fresh air is functionally 0% CO2, and you're moving maybe 6 times the gas volume in each direction.
Does that massive change in volume and diffusion gradient (at least at the start of a breath) means that you might be able to tolerate a higher CO2 level in the inhaled air?
AI didn't wrongly convict anyone. People leveraging AI did.
https://constelisvoss.com/en-gb/pages/a-computer-can-never-b...
Essentially with apparently innocent and cheap sensors you can determine what happen in a home, perhaps selling some smart bulb who can just tune the light and light on automatically when you enter a room then turn off after a short period of time. Apparently a simple and innocent comfort idea, but also a potential cheap remote spying device.
We already know some "strange" attacks like discovering keys pressed on a mechanical keyboard via the produced ambient noise, any of such potential threat alone seems innocent and low risk, but put together allow for a potentially cheap mass surveillance inside homes walls in a far less monitored ways.
Those who don't may forever get 0%
I could see the case for that if it were accurate. But every implementation I’ve seen doesn’t give you accurate Git information. It gives you the status of the repo as it was when you last ran a command. If you are working on the repo in a separate editor window, then the Git information in your prompt is usually incorrect. Incorrect information is worse than no information. Besides which, your editor normally provides this information as you are working on it. Why does outdated Git information belong in a prompt when there are more convenient places to get the correct information?
Also how is "enter" less convenient than literally any other command that you'd still have to type and run to get up-to-date information in a command line?