If you have ever used something like yacc/bison, debugging it is relatively sane with gdb.

You can find all the possible tricks in making it debuggable by reading the y.tab.c

Including all the corner cases for odd compilers.

Re2c is a bit more modern if you don't need all the history of yacc.

Static inline functions can sometimes serve as an optimisation barrier to compilers. Its very annoying. I've run into a lot of cases when targeting C as a compilation target where swapping something out into an always-inline function results in worse code generation, because compilers have bugs sadly

There's also the issue in that the following two things don't have the same semantics in C:

    float v = a * b + c;

vs

    static_inline float get_thing(float a, float b) {
        return a*b;
    }

    float v = get_thing(a, b) + c;

This is just a C-ism (floating point contraction) that can make extracting things into always inlined functions still be a big net performance negative. The C spec mandates it sadly!

uintptr_t's don't actually have the same semantics as pointers either. Eg if you write:

    void my_func(strong_type1* a, strong_type2* b);

a =/= b, and we can pull the underlying type out. However, if you write:

    void my_func(some_type_that_has_a_uintptr_t1 ap, some_type_that_has_a_uintptr_t2 bp) {
        float* a = get(ap);
        float* b = get(bp);
    }

a could equal b. Semantically the uintptr_t version doesn't provide any aliasing semantics. Which may or may not be what you want depending on your higher level language semantics, but its worth keeping the distinction in mind because the compiler won't be able to optimise as well

  float v = (float) ((float) a) * ((float) b) + c;

  float v = ((float) a) * ((float) b) + c;

The main purpose of a handle is to open a door, not look polished. Looking polished is not helpful when you're dead because you couldn't get out of that car in an emergency . So IMHO it shouldn't be surprising that they're being banned.

That's not a good counter. I think you need to look at how many of that demographic actually drives, not how big the demographic is. Or maybe kilometers driven per accident.

It’s probably a bit late for that. BEV will have taken the market four new cars before such a campaign could take root.