In the meantime it's possible to insert emoji into text as smiley, -smiley-, :) , smiley.jpg, ::smiley:: or whatever you want and the system you use is free to change it into a picture.
We end up with standard that is full of ancient symbols from 2000-2025 and new generations of people will abandon them for something else when the culture changes.
Emoji from 80s:
________
/ "Ship Arriving Too Late to
/ Save a Drowning Witch"
/ /\ F. ZappaPeople really drink the koolaid that is written on these sites and it is extremely detrimental to their companies. PostgreSQL with a nice boring Java/.NET layer would blow this stuff out of the water performance wise (for their actual real life usecase), would be far easier to manage, deploy, find people for etc. I mean; using these stacks is good for my wallet as advisor, but I have no clue why people do it when they are not even close to 1/100000th of Facebook.
I witnessed someone that wanted to leverage their service into a promotion so they started pushing for an architecture where everything flowed through their service.
It was the slowest part of our stack and capped at 10tps.
public boolean foo() {
if (!this.doesSomethingWithA()) {
return false;
}
if (!this.doesSomethingWithB()) {
return false;
}
if (!this.fooBar2000.isEmpty()) {
return false;
}
if (!this.anotherLongAttribute) {
return false;
}
if (!this.anotherMethod()) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
We try to replace to a "one liner" return !A && !B && !C ... Well, the expression was very long and we noted that was more hard to read that the multiple if's. I suggested split the one liner expression on multiples lines doing something like this : return !this.doesSomethingWithA()
&& !this.doesSomethingWithB()
&& !this.fooBar2000.isEmpty()
&& !this.anotherLongAttribute
&& !this.anotherMethod();
However, the code formatter (eclipse), changes every time it to the hard to read one liner expression. So we ended using the multiple if's.It seems like tolerating this may not be in the best interest of the community going forward. And I would find it interesting to be able to claim that magic leap has sued me for distributing 3 month old api docs to myself.
Do you have that much money to burn?
What if we were to set up a project in response to this that made the Magic Leap API docs available in a distributed fashion? As well as a technical breakdown of everything that can be learned from them.
Is there no way to disobey in a productive way? Or is our only choice to agree to being bullied into submission for pointless reasons?
If your name is still attached you will still get these letters. Because they will continue to try and show they are protecting their IP.
> As well as a technical breakdown of everything that can be learned from them.
Then that would be your IP which you'd be free to distribute. You won't receive the same letter again, but you may be breaking an NDA and the terms of which may apply.
Why do you think that ipfs and/or blockchain is going to change how copying IP works?