which is completely real and scientifically verified, despite your scare quotes.
I might add that nothing in your link claims that Gulf War Syndrome is psychogenic.
And of course they probably never attempted to get electrical utility planning permission until they already sunk money into construction.
The same actually very rarely happens in the US, where utilities of all kinds have capacity planning that can result in a denial of services for new hookups.
In order to do this, you need to have all your permits in order. Unfortunately, the energy companies announced out of the blue that they didn't have enough energy to accommodate all their new obligations...
I would also be opposed to anything that makes my neighborhood less desirable, it's all a property value drop. If my property is right now 300k, and new development makes it 250k, it's like I'm making a 50k donation out of nowhere. Now imagine, I bought the property on loan, and I owe 300k, and I have to essentially hand out 50k.
Why not also shame anyone who is unwilling to make donations that everyone else aren't compelled to make? If it's taxes, it's fine, but it makes no sense to have random or directed donation asks.
Because infrastructure has go somewhere.
The Netherlands has this issue: everyone resists any energy infrastructure in their area. Now there are many people who own new houses who can't move in because there's no electric power for them. Nuclear power is impossible because of NIMBY, so 85% of the energy is fossil fuel based.
https://puter.com/app/cloudtabs-browserbox
If you read past the "Woah, there pardner." You'll see a paragraph that says, Try logging in or creating an account here to get back to browsing.
This works. You can use reddit if you just create an account or sign in.
I guess this is IP-based blocking to counter bots.
edit: Oh boy, these tiny servers are not meant for this kind of hug. They may suffer!
Cutesie error messages aren't funny even the first time, and by the tenth time they are wildly annoying.
> if you just create an account
"Just"
In seriousness, the upside with code assistants is increasingly clear. And may be the bet that these would continue to improve quadratically is worth taking if you're a VC. In fact, PG argues that buying into hype cycles is the default: https://paulgraham.com/herd.html
So far, the utility on existing codebases is less than zero.
> continue to improve quadratically
Using what metric?
No, I didn't, but you again missed the full context. Neither of those terms can be considered in isolation, so again:
> You hereby grant to Vultr a non-exclusive [...] in any way that Vultr deems appropriate [...] for purposes of providing the Services to you
So unless it's for the purpose of providing you the service, it doesn't matter what Vultr "deems" appropriate.
Feel free to check this with a lawyer if you feel unsure.
"Deemed" in particular doesn't require any sort of reasoning or argument for the company to make any decision it likes. And "appropriate" is not a synonym for "necessary".
"Why did you sell my data?" "We deemed it appropriate for the purposes of providing the Services to you."
What's your legal refutation to this under US law?
(In the EU, this whole clause would possibly be unenforceable from the start, but I know a lot less about EU law.)
"... for purposes of providing the Services to you."
if you take the narrowest read, it would allow them to store or cache them. That's it.
It is a wildcard that allows them to do whatever they want with the data and then argue, "We deemed it appropriate."