But he’s terrible if you want criticisms of left-side ideas, or if you want to hear about right-side policies that are working well.
To me, that’s of very limited utility.
But he’s terrible if you want criticisms of left-side ideas, or if you want to hear about right-side policies that are working well.
To me, that’s of very limited utility.
But so far, all the robot demonstrations have been faked and the AI was spun off as a separate private Musk company.
We are going to have to give our IDs and biometrics to untrusted 3rd parties just because some people don't like the idea of other people's kids using the internet.
If these sites are so bad, maybe laws should instead target that problem. For example, make it illegal for social media companies to make their products addictive.
Instead, we get insanely invasive half-measures that impede on security, privacy and speech, with the added bonus of politicians whipping people up into moral panics in order to pass them.
We apparently live in a world where companies are legally considered to be people, and thus have rights, yet they have no moral obligations whatsoever.
Looks like the ruling gov still sees their citizens as such
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penal_transportation?wprov=sft...
> I would be absolutely elated if the end result of all this crap is a judicial president that eviscerates the many parallel systems that the feds/state/local governments run in all sorts of specialty areas of law.
I think we saw what giving power to the "right guy" in the executive branch lead us. The thing that will stop us going down this road is, at this point, active resistance from local and state governments, private businesses and government contractors, and large multi-national corporations.
You need a lot of ICE, an absolutely staggering number of cops and jails, to deport twenty million people. It should be crystal clear by now that they will attempt to follow through with this promise, by whatever means necessary.
Nobody in office wanted to enforce what Brexit was voted for. They wanted to pay lip service to respecting it, but continue business as usual, or even go worse into the same direction Brexit was voted to get away from.
It's not a Brexit problem (especially since major EU countries have the same issues). It's a "Brexit only in name" problem.