Readit News logoReadit News
MildlySerious commented on Digital Iris [video]   youtube.com/watch?v=Kg_2M... · Posted by u/surprisetalk
MildlySerious · 5 days ago
That felt a little like watching a modern version of Primitive Technology. Cool project, very nice mode of presentation.
MildlySerious commented on Design and Implementation of Sprites   fly.io/blog/design-and-im... · Posted by u/sethev
boundlessdreamz · 2 months ago
Is there a way to copy files to/from the sprite? Couldn't see an option for that in the CLI
MildlySerious · 2 months ago
I would love to just mount a directory via SFTP, so I can use my IDE alongside the far-away Claude. That would put this in the realm of daily use for development.
MildlySerious commented on enclose.horse   enclose.horse/... · Posted by u/DavidSJ
adonovan · 2 months ago
I think you should change the cherries to a battery and call the game Correct Horse Battery Stable.
MildlySerious · 2 months ago
That is just delightful.

Reference[1] for anyone wondering.

[1] https://xkcd.com/936/

MildlySerious commented on Stardew Valley developer made a $125k donation to the FOSS C# framework MonoGame   monogame.net/blog/2025-12... · Posted by u/haunter
sneak · 2 months ago
Gifts do not confer obligation. Copying deprives the original party of nothing. Absolutely nothing about free software requires or even implies any responsibility to “give back”. This idea that anyone making money with free software somehow owes the original authors anything (or “should” donate a portion of their profits) is ridiculous.

If the authors wanted money for their software, they would have sold it instead of giving it away for free as a gift.

By releasing software under free software licenses you are explicitly stating that you do not expect or anticipate payment for it. The licenses (that they freely chose) are clear. Free software, in addition to being free as in speech, is also always free as in beer.

My friend bought me lunch. I used that energy at my job. Do I owe them part of my paycheck?

MildlySerious · 2 months ago
There really is no prize for being technically correct on this one.

Someone built this and is letting you have it. For free. There is no legal obligation or law of the universe here, sure, but if you're in the top 1% of benefactors of this pro bono work, you have the opportunity to do some good and make sure that others, like you, get the chance to benefit from this free work in the future.

There is a pretty straightforward argument to be made that this falls under the "with great power comes great opportunity" umbrella of moral reasoning, since this work empowered CA to create the game that earned him a lot of money.

MildlySerious commented on Cloudflare was down   cloudflare.com/... · Posted by u/mektrik
MildlySerious · 3 months ago
I can't update DNS entries for my domains with Porkbun, because it's "Powered by Cloudflare".
MildlySerious commented on Why Replicate is joining Cloudflare   blog.cloudflare.com/why-r... · Posted by u/chmaynard
nottorp · 3 months ago
So how long until Cloudflare joins the hated monopolies list?
MildlySerious · 3 months ago
Their entire business model is effectively centralizing the web. The downtime over the last two weeks shows some of the problem with that.

I have used their products and have more favor toward them than I do for the corporations you're referring to, but ultimately my question is the same.

MildlySerious commented on Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg   ziglang.org/news/migratin... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
aadishv · 3 months ago
I feel like that's the whole point of the OP. I agree with the overall post but mentioning the ICE relationship seems to detract from the main point.

"I hate GitHub because X Y and Z features are bad" is a good reason to move away; "I hate GitHub because one of their thousands of enterprise customers does not align with my political views" is not, in my opinion.

For the record, I do not support ICE

MildlySerious · 3 months ago
People protesting ICE do not do so out of political concern, but humanitarian concern.

This seems like a minor nitpick as those two are intimately tangled up, but it matters to make the distinction. Standing up for others is not petty or self-serving and that's exactly what this sort of conflation can falsely imply.

MildlySerious commented on Rust in Android: move fast and fix things   security.googleblog.com/2... · Posted by u/abraham
samdoesnothing · 4 months ago
They found a memory safety bug in their Rust code and assumed it was the only memory safety bug in their Rust codebase. And then they compared it to the historical average in C++ code that's been around for almost two decades in production. I can't be the only one here who sees how biased this comparison is right?
MildlySerious · 4 months ago
Even if they are off by a factor of 100 it's a huge win and the point stands.

It's fair to point this out and worth the mention. Still, I'd like to think that the engineers behind this can at least gauge the benefit of this endeavor with some accuracy despite the discrepancy in available data, and stating the data that is available only makes sense.

MildlySerious commented on Europe Can No Longer Ignore That It's Under Russian Attack   worldpoliticsreview.com/e... · Posted by u/_tk_
newsclues · 5 months ago
No one listened, no one prepared.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Munich_speech_of_Vladim...

It’s not like there was any warning signs…

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Georgian_War

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Airlines_Flight_17

Bullies exploit weaknesses. Time to grow a pair.

MildlySerious · 5 months ago
I have always found the summary of Foundations of Geopolitics[1] to be an interesting re-read whenever some larger event involving Russia happened. It feels like the puzzle pieces have been coming together at least since Brexit, if not much longer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics#Con...

MildlySerious commented on Cloud-forming isoprene and terpenes from crops may drastically improve climate   smithsonianmag.com/scienc... · Posted by u/gsf_emergency_2
IncreasePosts · 8 months ago
Who cares about per capita emissions? Billionaires could have 1000x the emissions as normal people, but there are so few of them, cutting their emissions down to zero would have absolutely no impact on climate change.
MildlySerious · 8 months ago
You could cut the emissions of the top 1% in half, or reduce the emissions of the bottom 4 billion to 0. Same result.

Which do you believe is likely the lower hanging fruit, has a higher return per dollar spent and is likely to be more ethical and less invasive?

So yeah. I care about per capita emissions on the grounds that things need to change fast, and adjusting the lifestyle of a few million is radically easier than wiping half the planet off the emissions map.

u/MildlySerious

KarmaCake day914March 20, 2013View Original