Readit NewsMallocVoidstar commented on The surprise deprecation of GPT-4o for ChatGPT consumers simonwillison.net/2025/Au... · Posted by u/tosh
No this isn't always the case.
Perhaps if somebody were to shut down your favourite online shooter without warning you'd be upset, angry and passionate about it.
Some people like myself fall into this same category, we know its a token generator under the hood, but the duality is it's also entertainment in the shape of something that acts like a close friend.
We can see the distinction, evidently some people don't.
This is no different to other hobbies some people may find odd or geeky - hobby horsing, ham radio, cosplay etc etc.
People were saying they'd kill themself if OpenAI didn't immediately undeprecate GPT-4o. I would not have this reaction to a game being shut down.
Some person on Twitter (self-proclaimed "Founder of Bedrock") is using ChatGPT to have fun, generate noise and get attention. Meanwhile, some other person (self-proclaimed "CEO of exodusorbitals") on HN hallucinates and/or defames that a person on Twitter:
* has some mental illness (sorry, no right to diagnose)
* it is somehow related to being "an OpenAI investor" (no, just a regular ChatGPT user)
>self-proclaimed "Founder of Bedrock"
You know you can look him up? https://bedrockcap.com/geoff-lewis
>Geoff Lewis is the Founder and Managing Partner of Bedrock, a technology investment firm with a concentrated portfolio across sectors including AI, defense, infrastructure, and digital assets.
It's not even open-weight. It's weight-available. It uses a "modified MIT license":
Modified MIT License
Copyright (c) 2025 Moonshot AI
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the “Software”), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.
Our only modification part is that, if the Software (or any derivative works
thereof) is used for any of your commercial products or services that have
more than 100 million monthly active users, or more than 20 million US dollars
(or equivalent in other currencies) in monthly revenue, you shall prominently
display "Kimi K2" on the user interface of such product or service.4-clause BSD is considered open source by Debian and the FSF and has a similar requirement.
Why is that flagged? The post does not show any concerns about the ongoing genocide in Gaza, it's purely analyzing the LLM response in a technical perspective.
It makes Musk/X look bad, so it gets flagged.
I wonder what the basis is for the description of the 3.7 / 4 ruby releases is. I haven't seen this transition plan with version numbers described outside of this blog post.
It's used as an example here: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20205
But not actually stated it's the plan. I'd bet whatever LLM wrote the article took it as a stronger statement than it is.
Farside extension, 847 stars: https://github.com/benbusby/farside
Using venrable farside.link
https://sr.ht/~benbusby/farside/
Why use your offering?
Using Farside means the initial redirect goes through Farside, so they are capable of knowing what videos you're watching, what tweets you're looking at, etc. You have to trust them not to monitor this. Using a client-side extension means only the instance you use knows this.
MallocVoidstar commented on Why JPEGs still rule the web (2024) spectrum.ieee.org/jpeg-im... · Posted by u/purpleko
AV1's advantage narrows to ~5% over H.265 at very high data rates, in the same way that MP3 at 320 kbps is competitive with AAC at 320 kbps. But AV1 is never worse than H.265 from a VMAF/PSNR perspective at any bitrate, and of course H.265 is heavily patent encumbered in comparison. https://chipsandcheese.com/p/codecs-for-the-4k-era-hevc-av1-...
I don't care about VMAF or PSNR, I care about looking with my eyes. With x265 on veryslow and AV1 on preset 0/1, and the source being a UHD BD I was downscaling to 1080p, AV1 looked worse even while using a higher bitrate than x265. Current AV1 encoders have issues with small details and have issues with dark scenes. People are trying to fix them (see svt-av1-psy, being merged into SVT-AV1 itself) but the problems aren't fixed yet.
[1] https://blog.startifact.com/posts/xee/
[2] https://github.com/Paligo/xee
[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43502291
My understanding is that browsers specifically use the 1999 version and changing this would break compat