I took a look at https://daisyui.com/components/button/ and immediately I see classes that look similar to Bootstrap.
So my question is: Why build components on top of something like Tailwind instead of just regular CSS? Or are you able to customize and use Tailwind mixed in with the components? Then sure why not I guess.
Otherwise it feels like going full circle here.
In Denmark we had a year to make government/public apps fully accessible and the same for websites and documents presented on websites.
We also had to create accessibility certificates and dedicated pages on the websites to prove and clarify the state of the accessibility (or lack of, together with a statement of what's being done to remedy the issues).
Are these "new" EU laws for a different sector (private?) or something else? I can't find any references in the article. I may be blind (pun intended).
1) Why do you guys care what ads are being displayed to you?
2) Do you even allow ads to be displayed in the first place (ad blockers etc.) ?
3) Yes, we get it. Uninstall Facebook/IG/WhatsApp..., but no. Most people in the world use these, and you're still targeted without using them.
4) Why just Meta? What about Google, YouTube, Bing and many other ad providers?
5) Is this a political campaign by Warner Bros., EFF or someone else?
6) Shouldn't this stuff just be regulated instead? I'm sure the EU has some regulations at least. What about the US?
I don't mind the slight political aspects of things, but reading a ton of hate and "I already deleted X" (pun intended) and "Just use Y other platform" (that no normal user can figure out) comments is just uninteresting and should stay on Reddit or wherever these nonproductive comments fit into.
I'd love to hear more about this case, the technical aspects and the follow-ups/investigations. Let's focus on that, no? Maybe it's just me.
Kudos!
I've never been a fan of this kind of magic, and I wonder how other languages deal with this case.
I'll have to have a look at this next time I'm on a Linux desktop, as I found the options lacking compared to ShareX last time I looked.
This thinking is the problem. "Oh, we just added your entire private/privileged/NDA/corporate information to our training set without your consent. What's the problem?"
Opt-out must be the default.
Edit: By "Opt-out must be the default." I mean: no one's data must be included until they explicitly give consent via an opt-in :)
Don't you mean opt-in must be the default?
Or am I misunderstanding the concept of opt-ins :P