Readit NewsCarbon exists only for interoperating with and transitioning off of C++. Creating a new code base in carbon doesn’t really make sense, and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.
> ... and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.
Could you quote which paragraph you're talking about?
AFAIK, interoperability with C++ code is just one of their explicit goals; they only place that as the last item in the "Language Goals" section.
Oh no , Rust is too tough, go is no good, am i going back to java?
Maybe the new in-development Carbon language? It sounds promising, but it is nowhere near its 1.0 release.
maxloh commented on "Remove mentions of XSLT from the html spec" github.com/whatwg/html/pu... · Posted by u/troupo
Here's the HTML spec: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/
An implementation with >90% market share becomes the defacto standard.
maxloh commented on "Remove mentions of XSLT from the html spec" github.com/whatwg/html/pu... · Posted by u/troupo
i thought that HTML spec is immutable.
The HTML spec is actually constantly evolving. New features like the dialog element [0] and popover [1] were added every year. But removing something from the spec is very rare, if it ever happened before.
[0]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Reference/...
[1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Reference/...
It's slow and sluggish, riddled with dark patterns and annoying pop ups, disrespects the user in every possible way, and hides basic editing functionality behind subscriptions.
The trashiest piece of crap software. It's up there with MS Word (which gets progressively more bloated on Mac).
Edit: Added "software" after crap for clarity.
I once found that a PDF file created with OnlyOffice displayed as intended on Chrome, but its embedded font couldn't be recognized or rendered correctly on Acrobat.
I keep Acrobat installed only for verifying the integrity of the PDF files I've created.