Eat crow, mate.
Eat crow, mate.
There simply isn't that much money in designing cores. The money is in selling SoCs or devices. Arm at least has made increasingly high quality cores available at reasonable prices to all comers. A future where Arm's business is made unviable is not necessarily better for consumers.
You can license RISC-V cores from Si-Five today but they if reports are correct they were in discussions to sell to Intel. If that were to happen who knows what would happen to their offering. There will be others of course but as you say it's not obvious that what they offer will be any better that what Arm offers today.
And for the foreseeable future Arm is immune to takeover by any of its deep-pocketed customers.
I'm very happy that RISC-V exists from a number of perspectives but there needs to be a realistic assessment of its potential impact.
I love express lanes, they cost so little and everyone stays out of them leading to a great experience for only 5-10 $
No ISA/architecture licensing fees, no restrictions on what you can do with it - you can build an open source core or you could sell your design to others. ARM/x86 doest have this, its all locked up behind lawyers.
I actually think this ought to be a positive for customers who are clearly abiding by the terms of their contracts.
I for one do not want the Federal Government controlling my employment, I dont want the federal government doing anything other than national defense.
So no I do not want EU employment laws here in the US.