Technical solutions to privacy are not required to be alone. They're required to be ubiquitous. If your country is an authoritarian hellhole, you encrypt everything to help you not get murdered by the secret police. If your country has strong privacy protections, you encrypt everything to help ensure that it never becomes an authoritarian hellhole, and protect you against bureaucratic failures as defense in depth.
To invade your privacy, an attacker should have to break the law and break the encryption.
Even if you're innocent, they'll make something up. I lived for a year in one of those authoritarian hellholes and in that time knew two people who were arrested and hauled from station to station til someone paid a bribe- these weren't the dissidents either, just some guys. The dissident was stabbed to death on his doorstep.
Encryption is good to save us from marketing, from megacorps making our lives hell. Laws and norms constrain the rest.
Most users don't care about the alignment and spacing and so on in isolation, but they do get a sense of quality from the overall impact. This stuff really matters in aggregate.
Red Letter Media has a great phrase that rolls around in my head to describe situations like this (they use it for media analysis), "You might not recognize it, but your brain did."
Where you might not be able to point to a problem, but you instinctively know something is off.
Let's not reduce everything to the least common denominator lest we end up like (formerly) Oregon where you couldn't pump your own gas because it was "dangerous" for the lay person.
The site pulls in an analytics script from the domain `route.run`.
Going to route.run redirects to routeshuffle.com.
routeshuffle.com/about :
Not only is the credit card form not actually hosted by Stripe even though it says it is, this isn't from an "experimental product studio in New York", it's a random teenager from New York that just slurped up your credit card info.