Readit News logoReadit News
Cyberdogs7 commented on Power over Ethernet (PoE) basics and beyond   edn.com/poe-basics-and-be... · Posted by u/voxadam
skulk · 2 months ago
Got any recommendations on what cameras to get? The market is absolutely flooded with cheap shitty cloud-connected all-in-one cameras making it hard to find good, simple products.
Cyberdogs7 · 2 months ago
I have built out several Amcrest systems. You have the many options for recording and access, that will allow remote access without going to the cloud.
Cyberdogs7 commented on Today is when the Amazon brain drain sent AWS down the spout   theregister.com/2025/10/2... · Posted by u/raw_anon_1111
collinmanderson · 2 months ago
> COE

I guessed this was an internal Amazon thing so I searched “Amazon COE”

Correction of Error

https://wa.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/2020-07-02T19-33-2...

> SDM

Software Developer Manager (from searching Amazon SDM)

https://amazon.jobs/content/en/how-we-hire/sdm-interview-pre...

Cyberdogs7 · 2 months ago
Thank you for providing clarity where I did not.
Cyberdogs7 commented on Today is when the Amazon brain drain sent AWS down the spout   theregister.com/2025/10/2... · Posted by u/raw_anon_1111
rags2riches · 2 months ago
> LOT

Just capitalised for emphasis, right?

> COE

Center of Excellence? Council of Europe? Still wondering even after Googling.

> SLA

Service Level Agreement. This I knew beforehand.

> SDM

Service Delivery Manager?

Cyberdogs7 · 2 months ago
Sorry, I sometimes forget the vernacular is not universal. The other sibling comment did provide the correct definitions.
Cyberdogs7 commented on Today is when the Amazon brain drain sent AWS down the spout   theregister.com/2025/10/2... · Posted by u/raw_anon_1111
pinkmuffinere · 2 months ago
> one really gets the sense that it took them 75 minutes to go from "things are breaking" to "we've narrowed it down to a single service endpoint, but are still researching," which is something of a bitter pill to swallow

Is 75 minutes really considered that long of a time? I don't do my day-job in webdev, so maybe I'm just naive. But being able to diagnose the single service endpoint in 75 minutes seems pretty good to me. When I worked on firmware we frequently spent _weeks_ trying to diagnose what part of the firmware was broken.

Cyberdogs7 · 2 months ago
For a service like AWS, 75 mins is going to result in a LOT of COE's for people on way it wasn't mitigated quicker. A Sev 1 like this has an SLA of 20 mins to mitigate impact. Writing about these failures will consume a dozen peoples time for the next 6 weeks.

I have 10 years of experience at Amazon as an L6/L7 SDM, across 4 teams (Games, logistics, Alexa, Prime video). I have also been on a team that caused a sev 1 in the past.

Cyberdogs7 commented on Most Illinois farmland is not owned by farmers   chicagotribune.com/2025/0... · Posted by u/NaOH
jancsika · 5 months ago
> On the other hand, if they were flying in a small airplane owned by one of them, it's illegal to split the costs of wear on the airplane, unless its a rental or air taxi.

This isn't true:

https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/...

That AC and the regulations cited in it couldn't be clearer-- if you and the pilot are both going to $destination for $reasons, you and the pilot can definitely split the cost of the fuel.

Moreover, this is perfectly analogous to the carpooling example as you stated it-- two people both having a stated purpose traveling to a destination, both sharing the cost of gas/wear.

There of course could be ways to carpool where the passengers pay the total cost of the driver's gas/wear/etc. You can't do that in your airplane. But again, I think the reasons for this are glaringly obvious-- keep silicon valley from attempting to create an unregulated taxi service in the sky. (In fact, IIRC there was someone who tried over a decade ago-- perhaps these laws are a response to that?)

> Because of this, and other similar effects of FAA regulations, many small airplane owners own a company that owns the airplane, instead of owning it outright, and rent the airplane from themselves, whenever they use it.

I mean, the pilots I know who do that are either a) multiple people owning a single plane, or b) single owner literally running a rental taxi service. Who isn't covered by those two categories?

Cyberdogs7 · 5 months ago
The op clearly stated wear, not fuel. Hourly rates on a plane will have a maintenance reserve, from tens to hundreds of dollars per hour. This cost can not be shared by a pilot. If the plane is owned by an LLC, and rents the plane to the pilot at a rate that includes the maintenance reserve, the cost of the rental CAN be split. So by putting the plane in an LLC, you can legally recoup the true cost from your friends.
Cyberdogs7 commented on Good pixel art can be one-shotted by AI now   gametorch.app/collections... · Posted by u/gametorch
Cyberdogs7 · 6 months ago
Pretty good stuff! I took the opposite journey and started in games then went to big tech, though I have continued to stay with the game industry the whole time with an indie game company I run on the side.

I did take up the challenge of trying to prompt an image generator into giving me a useable 2d sprite <https://nlevel.ai/images/K4oeERN4a0By/view)> and it's much harder than it looks.

I assume you are running some type of LLM to specially format the prompts to the image models, or is it more complex than that?

Cyberdogs7 commented on FromSoft's singular mech game Chromehounds is back online   readonlymemo.com/intervie... · Posted by u/pabs3
typesarecool · 7 months ago
I'd love a remake or a Chromehounds 2 on Xbox/PlayStation. I played it on the 360 but before I had online, so only in single player, but still loved it.
Cyberdogs7 · 7 months ago
I felt the same way, which is why I made M.A.V. but it's PC only.
Cyberdogs7 commented on Amazon exec: it's time to 'disagree and commit' to office return despite no data   fortune.com/2023/08/03/am... · Posted by u/softwaredoug
hot_gril · 2 years ago
If there's an unsavory reason, I think it's one or both of:

1. Employees slack more on average working from home. Employers want people stuck in a work-only place where they're monitored. Same as how open offices replaced cubicles "for cost reasons." I've seen evidence of this at my job.

2. They're heavily invested in physical offices in particular cities already, so much that they alone can sway the same real estate market they're invested in, and it's not a sunken cost yet.

Cyberdogs7 · 2 years ago
Talking to many CEO's of mid size companies, it seems to be an extension of point 2. They have received many tax incentives from the cities in which they are located, based on the employees they have there. With WFH, the cities are threatening those tax incentives.

Typically the tax incentives are deductible property tax, except sales tax, or some type of city provided R&D subsidy to help with state level taxes.

We received these back in 2010 with a 175 person game studio and we had 3 different cities pitching for us to move there. I have received outreach on even just a 5 person company. I can only imagine what cities will do with large employers.

Cyberdogs7 commented on Commercial Plant Starts Pulling Carbon from the Air   nytimes.com/2023/11/09/cl... · Posted by u/sandinmyjoints
DustinBrett · 2 years ago
Good they are finally starting this. Ever since I heard that this won't work cause it's too small, I started thinking that this will be what saves us after we go way over the edge as humanity. Hopefully I am wrong, but if not then hopefully at least we see many more of these to try and save ourselves at the 11th hour.
Cyberdogs7 · 2 years ago
I am happy to see progress in the right direction, but I can't help but feel the 11th hour was sometime in the 80's.
Cyberdogs7 commented on How to Not Get Screwed over as a Software Engineer [video]   ycombinator.com/library/K... · Posted by u/simonpure
ldjkfkdsjnv · 2 years ago
How to get rich in tech as a mediocre programmer:

1. Transfer to a TPM/QA Manager role at somewhere like Amazon or Microsoft. Bar is much lower to get into this role.

2. Get hired into a higher level than you could in a SWE role.

3. Transfer within the company to being an SDM

4. Now you are one level higher, in a management role, that would have taken you 5+ years of grinding and some luck to get into.

5. Spend a few years in this role, switch to other big co, makikg 400-500k+ while bossing around engineers much smarter than you.

^This path is how people are doing it. Never take equity in a startup, never grind away as a mid level engineer, fighting with ten other engineers for one promotion.

Edit:

Adding one point to this, if you found a company with a non technical CEO, and the company sees some success, all the focus will be on the CEO. The CTO role is highly replaceable, and there is a massive power shift that occurs once there is traction with a "finished" product. The CEO, especially in B2B Saas, is the face of the company. So the CEO can sit on his hands the whole time the product is developed, but then does reap huge gains. There's no easy answer, as many engineers do not have the soft skills for the role. But arguably, they could run these businesses themselves.

Cyberdogs7 · 2 years ago
I feel personally called out, as this was very much my path. However, I did continue to train my engineering skills and would be very embarrassed if any of the senior engineers in my team didn't think I had the same technical skills as them.

u/Cyberdogs7

KarmaCake day172July 1, 2021View Original