Readit News logoReadit News
AnssiH commented on RISC-V Is Sloooow   marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
echoangle · 2 days ago
Is there a simple explanation why RISC-V software has to be built on a RISC-V system? Why is it so hard for compilers to compile for a different architecture? The general structure of the target architecture lives inside the compiler code and isn’t generated by introspecting the current system, right?
AnssiH · a day ago
The cross-compiler part itself is easy, but getting all the build scripting of tens of thousands of Fedora packages to work perfectly for cross-compiling would be a lot of work.

There are lots of small issues (libraries or headers not being found, wrong libraries or headers being found, build scripts trying to run the binaries they just built, wrong compiler being used, wrong flags being used, etc.) when trying to cross-compile arbitrary software.

All fixable (cross-compiling entire distributions is a thing), but a lot of work and an extra maintenance burden.

AnssiH commented on Judge orders government to begin refunding more than $130B in tariffs   wsj.com/politics/policy/j... · Posted by u/JumpCrisscross
freetonik · 7 days ago
There was an interesting case in Finland. Finnish customs used to apply a 22% tax (ELV) on top of the car tax for imported used cars from other EU countries. On top of that, Finnish law required VAT to be charged on the car tax itself.

There were multiple court cases and this practice was found unlawful (and actually against EU law). But the government did not issue automatic refunds, and instead requested that people "actively appeal" with some time limits. They also refused to pay interest on the money withheld.

AFAIK, only about 50M Euro was paid back. A lot of funds gathered between 2002–2005 was never returned.

I've been living in Finland for 10+ years, and this whole story was super surprising for me to learn because the prevailing notion among people here is that Finland is the land of law, and everything is done correctly and legally, always, and we can and should trust the authorities.

AnssiH · 7 days ago
> There was an interesting case in Finland. Finnish customs used to apply a 22% tax (ELV) on top of the car tax for imported used cars from other EU countries. On top of that, Finnish law required VAT to be charged on the car tax itself.

There was no VAT payable on the car tax of imported cars, only the ELV (ei-arvonlisävero, literally "not value added tax").

The ELV idea was that for locally bought new cars you did have to pay VAT on car tax, but for used EU imports that was not legally possible (cannot charge VAT again when importing used item from another EU country), so an equivalent non-VAT tax was invented so the full tax (inc. VAT/ELV) stays the same.

But this was unfair for e.g. the reason that Finnish companies buying cars could deduct Finnish car tax VAT on local new cars on their VAT return but not the car tax ELV on imported used cars (since it was not VAT).

AnssiH commented on Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS   motorolanews.com/motorola... · Posted by u/km
raincole · 10 days ago
https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

If out of 720 MEPs, 568 are supporting Chat Control, then yes, I think it's very fair to say "The EU wants...".

AnssiH · 10 days ago
That site lists many of candidates as "support" just because they have not publicly opposed, so it is not a realistic view on the opinions of EU parliament. Better to look at actual votes cast.

Also, they are not distinguishing between supporting mandatory monitoring and other forms (e.g. present legal situation where monitoring is allowed).

The current proposals do not include mandatory monitoring. If mandatory chatcontrol had the wide support that site suggests, it would have been introduced and passed long ago.

AnssiH commented on VTT Test Donut Lab Battery Reaches 80% Charge in Under 10 Minutes [pdf]   pub-fee113bb711e441db5c35... · Posted by u/sagyam
jusssi · 17 days ago
The person whose signature is on it, is listed on VTTs website with the same title.

Considering the amount of publicity this thing gets, VTT or the person will publicly refute it pretty soon if it's a fake.

AnssiH · 17 days ago
Also, VTT had publicly confirmed earlier that they had conducted tests for Donut Lab.

I'm confident the document and tests are real, but other shenanigans are still possible (and likely IMO).

AnssiH commented on TikTok's 'addictive design' found to be illegal in Europe   nytimes.com/2026/02/06/bu... · Posted by u/thm
xienze · a month ago
The problem I have with the way the EU doles out these punishments is that they like to spring them on tech companies after years and years of radio silence and then suddenly it’s “hey TikTok, we just determined you’ve been breaking the law for years, pay us a couple billion please.”

Like, where were they years ago saying “hey TikTok, we think your design is addictive and probably illegal, you need to change or face penalties.” If TikTok continues to operate in the same manner despite a warning, sure, throw the book at them. Otherwise it just seems like the EU waits for years and years until a company is a big enough player and then retroactively decides they’ve been breaking the law for years. Doesn’t help the impression that they’re running a non-EU tech company shakedown campaign.

AnssiH · a month ago
> Like, where were they years ago saying “hey TikTok, we think your design is addictive and probably illegal, you need to change or face penalties.”

That is basically what happened today. No penalties have been issued at this point.

Also Commission had sent various requests for information to TikTok in 2023 before they opened these proceedings in early 2024 (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_...) - this didn't come out of the blue.

AnssiH commented on New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers   blog.adafruit.com/2026/02... · Posted by u/ptorrone
forgetfulness · a month ago
I'm behind the times! That's what it used to be until Windows XP, the last Windows version I used on a daily basis was Windows 2000 up to 2005.
AnssiH · a month ago
On Windows XP this depended on whether you had joined a domain. On joined systems you got the security screen (same as previous Windows NT/2000), on other systems the task manager (same as Windows 9x).
AnssiH commented on BirdyChat becomes first European chat app that is interoperable with WhatsApp   birdy.chat/blog/first-to-... · Posted by u/joooscha
WesolyKubeczek · 2 months ago
Aren’t SMS that are over 160 characters being concatenated? There used to be a standard for that.
AnssiH · 2 months ago
Generally yes.

I guess a phone/app could exist that does convert to MMS instead, though, since the app can make that decision.

AnssiH commented on IPv6 is not insecure because it lacks a NAT   johnmaguire.me/blog/ipv6-... · Posted by u/johnmaguire
dorfsmay · 2 months ago
When you say no ipv4 on regular phone plan, you mean no routable ipv4 on the internet, or no ipv4 at all?
AnssiH · 2 months ago
Regular phone plans on my carrier have a private IPv4 address behind CGNAT.
AnssiH commented on IPv6 is not insecure because it lacks a NAT   johnmaguire.me/blog/ipv6-... · Posted by u/johnmaguire
fdr · 2 months ago
For those of you with this handy technology, the mobile phone, in the United States: you have an IPv6 address without NAT. Some of you even exist on a network using 464XLAT to tunnel IPv4 in IPV6, because it's a pure IPV6 network (T-Mobile). These mobile phone providers do not let the gazillion consumer smartphones act as servers for obvious reasons.

This is all to underscore the author's point: NAT may necessitate stateful tracking, but firewalls without translation has been deployed at massive scale for one of the most numerous types of device in existence.

AnssiH · 2 months ago
> These mobile phone providers do not let the gazillion consumer smartphones act as servers for obvious reasons.

FWIW, I was interested so I tested this on my phone here in Finland (Elisa, the largest carrier here): IPv6 inbound TCP connections work just fine, unlike IPv4 which is behind CGNAT.

On mobile broadband (no calls) plans they also offer optional free public IPv4 address, but not on the regular phone plans.

(I did the test by installing Termux from Play Store, then in it running "pkg install netcat-openbsd" and "nc -6 -l 9956" and then connecting to that port from internet using telnet, while phone was not connected to WiFi.)

AnssiH commented on Postal Arbitrage   walzr.com/postal-arbitrag... · Posted by u/The28thDuck
kazinator · 2 months ago
Has this person tried it?

Doesn't Amazon shipping have to go to the billing address on the credit card?

Being able to purchase on a credit card and have it sent anywhere makes it that much easier to use stolen credit cards.

AnssiH · 2 months ago
> Doesn't Amazon shipping have to go to the billing address on the credit card?

No, I've had stuff shipped to plenty of addresses.

u/AnssiH

KarmaCake day1680March 25, 2017
About
http://onse.fi/contact/
View Original