Readit NewsDid she ask if a "statistical soup of words," if large enough, might somehow encode or represent something a little more profound than just a bunch of words?
I dont use reddit much anymore, but even I noticed that between the gloating about Charlie Kirk's assassination, disinformation that the shooter was far-right regularly hit the front page to the tune of 100K upvotes. Is that acceptable?
Take a look at /r/conservative when they often suddenly completely change their shared opinion.
Definitely more open discussion up in X. Here or in reddit everything gets flagged and banned pretty quickly which defeats the purpose.
I’m not trying to be obtuse here. I really want to understand some sort of reasonable moral justification for actively avoiding paying for a service that you are using / circumventing the mechanism by which the business makes money.
This is generally of no interest to consumers.
You really might want to explain that further. At face value, that sounds like parroted right-wing rhetoric.
Its about unchecked corruption, abuse, and the misuse of power. It's a mistake to believe such things are only done by "them" in a different country.