Readit News logoReadit News
0x8BADF00D commented on U.S. backs down in fight with Harvard, MIT over student visas   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/OminousWeapons
thephyber · 5 years ago
I would argue the end-users (voters) mostly consider this a bug while the developers (majority party legislators at the state level) consider it a feature.

Also, the founding fathers famously made it difficult for Congress to change anything, so dysfunction was definitely a feature.

0x8BADF00D · 5 years ago
Not so sure about that. I suppose the original intent was to have a healthy debate around major policy decisions. It's a check against wanton liberalism or conservatism. Congress seems eager to pass spending bills and take away our privacy. They move at light speed when doing that.
0x8BADF00D commented on Resignation Letter   bariweiss.com/resignation... · Posted by u/kirillzubovsky
shuntress · 5 years ago
Aha! Yes!!

The most obvious first step is to form a leadership group to manage coordination. Different people to be in charge of printing/hosting and distribution, payroll, HR, research, etc, etc.

0x8BADF00D · 5 years ago
Sure. Except it’s decentralized.
0x8BADF00D commented on Resignation Letter   bariweiss.com/resignation... · Posted by u/kirillzubovsky
jrumbut · 5 years ago
They have 1,600 journalists last year that were sent to 150 countries [1]. What other organization is doing anything like that effort to gather facts around the world?

Who is doing more collective discovery (and making it accessible to the public at a price an average person can afford)? I can only think of a handful of organizations that are serious candidates (Reuters? The BBC? Wikipedia?).

Weird puff pieces, drama on the editorial pages (what else would there be?), declining standards, you could find the same complaints any year since the first newspaper. I can't take them too seriously until I see an alternative that does the work of collective discovery.

[1] https://www.nytco.com/journalism/journalists-on-the-ground/

0x8BADF00D · 5 years ago
> I can't take them too seriously until I see an alternative that does the work of collective discovery.

There is an alternative. It is you and I. The citizen journalist will become the arbiter of truth tomorrow. And that arbitration will be decided on rationality. There will be no more credentialism and gatekeeping. That is why the traditional media companies are scared shitless.

0x8BADF00D commented on Resignation Letter   bariweiss.com/resignation... · Posted by u/kirillzubovsky
kup0 · 5 years ago
Yeah hard to take seriously someone who was "masquerading as an opponent of viewpoint intolerance" while simultaneously being intolerant of any viewpoints that aren't pro-Israel
0x8BADF00D · 5 years ago
Whoa, cool it with the Anti-Semitism there buddy! /s
0x8BADF00D commented on The international student bait-and-switch   themargins.substack.com/p... · Posted by u/cancan
zozin · 5 years ago
I too am an immigrant to the United States and it's frustrating to read this, and not because the reasons most people might think. I came here as a child and I am reminded every day of the privilege American residency and citizenship affords me. The family that I left behind in my home country is still struggling to make ends meet, while I was, as recently as Feb. 2020, making nearly $200K per year as an attorney. I lost my job due to Covid-19, but I am optimistic that my future is bright, mostly because America is still a land of opportunity, unlike the vast majority of the world.

Mr. Duruk's thought's are frustrating to read because he assumes his privilege. He assumes he's owed an easy and straightforward journey to citizenship, that his future as a foreign-student shouldn't be jeopardized in the least by the political whims of the local population, as if the ravaged parts of THIS nation which screamed out and democratically elected a protectionist president do not deserve to be heard at the international's community's expense.

America isn't perfect, no country is, but having lived here for twenty years, having experienced life in other places, and having traveled internationally, I wouldn't chose another place as my home--and apparently neither would Mr. Duruk.

While I do not agree with this administration's immigration policies, I have enough perspective to realize that immigration policy is ultimately beholden to the local population. That is what democracy entails. Nobody owes anybody anything in life, complaining as if you are owed something reeks of privilege and a sense of entitlement.

0x8BADF00D · 5 years ago
Reading your comment and the original post really made me thankful for what I have. It goes to show that you have very little control of things in life. There are countless headwinds that influence the decisions you make. Some are invisible.
0x8BADF00D commented on The stock market and economy have parted ways   washingtonpost.com/opinio... · Posted by u/cs702
malandrew · 5 years ago
> especially Tesla with no clear reason why

It's called a short squeeze.

0x8BADF00D · 5 years ago
VIX needs to hit 40+ before that happens.

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

0x8BADF00D commented on US citizens warned they face arbitrary arrest in China   m.dw.com/en/us-citizens-w... · Posted by u/everybodyknows
alex_anglin · 5 years ago
Isn't the point of arbitrary arrest that the crime is figured out afterwards, if at all?
0x8BADF00D · 5 years ago
Sort of. In many Asian countries, the rule of law is very weak or nonexistent. This means you will eventually come into contact with the police - usually for the purpose of extorting a bribe from you.
0x8BADF00D commented on Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized   nature.com/articles/s4159... · Posted by u/sega_sai
jablongo · 5 years ago
Given the epic title I was pretty unimpressed by this line of thinking. The argument seems to rely on (among other things) certain presumed implications of “Computers not inhabiting the world” - a comical line of reasoning that cites a lack of a childhood among other absurd reasons for why computers can’t be intelligent. The author assumes that intelligence can only be derived from experiencing the world in full... which seems to imply that paraplegics are inhibited from intelligent thought. Taking that further - are we not capable of intelligent thought during dreams? Fjelland goes on to argue that with no way to fully interact with the world computers are barred from intelligence. Firstly there’s no reason for us to believe that computers will stop broadening the methods by which they connect to, measure, and actuate the world around them. Secondly it seems plausible that a person locked in a room with a radio to communicate with the outside world would eventually acquire intelligence without ever fully experiencing the world.
0x8BADF00D · 5 years ago
> Secondly it seems plausible that a person locked in a room with a radio to communicate with the outside world would eventually acquire intelligence without ever fully experiencing the world.

Without fully experiencing the outside world, such an agent will still have gaps in intelligence. Knowing the specific wavelength of the color red (564–580 nm), and how the optic nerve processes color is different than the experience of seeing a red flower in the world for the first time.

u/0x8BADF00D

KarmaCake day257July 2, 2017View Original