Readit News logoReadit News
cluckindan · 3 months ago
This will never catch on in the building industry unless it can demonstrate significant time/cost savings.

If it does get adopted, those time/cost savings are going to be skewed towards the initial building phase, and renovation will get more expensive. Sure, a renovator can remove the surface layer easier, but then they either have to resurface the existing one, or buy a new one, both of which are guaranteed to be more costly than resurfacing ordinary drywall (or just papering over the existing wallpaper).

kqr · 4 months ago
I am puzzled. They mention velcro doesn't work with rigid surfaces, but when they show a picture of what I assume is their solution, it seems to utilise ... "a flexible sheet material", i.e. a non-rigid surface.
stavros · 4 months ago
Then the logical conclusion is that they meant that velcro doesn't work when at least one of the surfaces is rigid.
chrismcb · 3 months ago
Why are you puzzled? "Doesn't work with rigid surfaces" shows it working with a non rigid surface. Of course what the article says is a true system didn't work with a rigid surface, but they came up with something close.
istjohn · 4 months ago
Perhaps the flexible sheet is just used so it can be peeled back to reveal the mechanics of the connecting bits--perhaps the flexibility is purely pedagogical.
istjohn · 4 months ago
Slightly off-topic, but recently I had the thought that it would be fun to implement a hook-and-loop system with the hooks and loops made from heavy guage wire embedded in concrete or welded to steel. Could such a system be strong enough to lift hundreds of tons? Perhaps it could be used to rapidly assemble military infrastructure like bridges or defensive structures--literally velcro the pieces together.
Eddy_Viscosity2 · 3 months ago
But would this approach be better than other current approaches where things slide together with some simple locking mechanism. And if this hard-core metal vecro worked as well as you hoped, how would you get it apart?
istjohn · 3 months ago
It's hard to beat slapping something together. It might not come apart, or maybe a shape memory alloy could be used for the hooks?
yjftsjthsd-h · 4 months ago
So I'm fond of the goal, and experimentation is good, but couldn't you get the sameish result by using screws to attach things?
theshrike79 · 4 months ago
It's not trivial to attach something heavy to an interior drywall.
IshKebab · 4 months ago
This is using concrete though. It is pretty trivial to attach heavy things to concrete with screws.

I think the only reason you wouldn't use screws is if you don't want to leave a hole (but then you probably don't want weird knobs sticking out), or if it's meant to be temporary.

IshKebab · 4 months ago
Interesting idea. Some obvious thoughts:

1. Those little nubs of concrete are going to snap off in about 5 seconds. Might work for other materials though I guess.

2. What's the advantage over just attaching velcro to the wall?

3. French cleats exist. This probably covers most use cases.

Fun experiment though.

aitchnyu · 3 months ago
Tangential, are there additives to give shear/tensile or other strengths to non-cube concrete shapes?
IAmBroom · 3 months ago
1. Exactly.

2. Less adhesive? Not sure.

3. Exactly.