Readit News logoReadit News
xhkkffbf · 6 months ago
Certainly that's not the full cost. It just subsidizes it heavily. (Not that it's a bad idea to do so. Just that $7 isn't the real cost.)
stevenwoo · 6 months ago
The article has sources that claim even with the subsidies it generates profit due to enabling mothers to work (and opening up jobs for single parents) plus higher paying jobs for childcare based on studies done originally in multiple trialed places in the USA that made the same claim - for each dollar put in, the government got back twelve roughly. Simply -a mother that doesn’t work doesn’t generate income tax and children who grow up in poor environments have bad outcomes that cost the government money. No where does the article claim that the parents shoulder the actual cost.
bn-l · 6 months ago
Do those stats take into account the negative externality of the child being raise for a large portion of its most critical years by a stranger instead of the mother (or father)?

Dead Comment

spacechild1 · 6 months ago
I think everyone is aware of that.
rufus_foreman · 6 months ago
So you have flagged the inaccurate headline then?
Canada · 6 months ago
[flagged]
tomhow · 6 months ago
> That is bullshit.

> Quebec can provide all kinds of things with the billions of dollars it takes away from the people of other provinces every year.

Please avoid inflammatory, political/ideological outbursts like this on HN.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

mystified5016 · 6 months ago
[flagged]
tomhow · 6 months ago
> extremely juvenile and uninformed take

Please edit swipes of comments on HN. If someone seems uninformed to you, think about how to educate rather than deride.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

cwillu · 6 months ago
There's a wildly misinformed group that spends a lot of time whining about equalization payments without understanding the first thing about them.
bn-l · 6 months ago
It depends where the gov spends it. And it’s more like mugging because theft doesn’t necessarily imply there’s a gun whereas with taxation there is.
syeare · 6 months ago
Taxation without representation could not be juvenile thinking, it's a founding concept of my country which seems to be lost today
aeries · 6 months ago
Isn't OP just arguing that, on balance, the other provinces subsidize Quebec via federal taxes?