Readit News logoReadit News
DriftRegion · a year ago
Anyone know more about the payload? Here's what I've found: It's carrying the "Blue Ring Pathfinder Payload", part of the "Dark-Sky 1 Mission"

> Dark-Sky 1 is jointly funded by DIU and Blue Origin. [5]

DIU is "The Pentagon’s commercial technology arm, the Defense Innovation Unit"

[1] https://www.blueorigin.com/news/blue-ring-pathfinder-payload

[2] https://www.diu.mil/latest/companies-selected-for-diu-orbita...

[3] https://www.meritalk.com/articles/diu-orbital-logistics-awar...

[4] https://www.geekwire.com/2024/blue-origin-ring-darksky-1/

[5] https://spacenews.com/defense-innovation-unit-awards-three-c...

rubzah · a year ago
"Dark Sky" funded by the Pentagon. Sounds chipper.
findthewords · a year ago
If there's anything in the name, I would guess an anti-satellite EMP.
raverbashing · a year ago
I wonder if it might need some extra mass simulators (probably not depending on how heavy the payload is)
thomascountz · a year ago
mkl · a year ago

Dead Comment

moffkalast · a year ago
I'm sure the weather will git gud soon.
evil-olive · a year ago
with every other rocket launch livestream I've watched (SpaceX, NASA, Rocket Lab, etc) when there's a delay they would announce it explicitly.

instead, it was at T-18min, they spent a few minutes talking about how fancy the engines were, and then finish with "alright, with 35 minutes left on the countdown..."

edit: they did it again. 11 minutes, they've pretty clearly told the talking heads to vamp, so they're rambling about how cool the "rocket park" is (and how they had to relocate a bunch of turtles while building it) and meanwhile the countdown disappears for a few seconds then resets to 38 minutes.

Tepix · a year ago
They really need to establish communications to let the viewers know why they are adding time to the clock.
gmueckl · a year ago
Cynically, this feels like Corporate Messaging 101: don't ever admit that anything bad happened. Ignore it if you can. If you can't anymore, spin it into something positive at all costs. If it's bad news, be as vague and euphemistic as possible.
dotancohen · a year ago
It also took SpaceX some time to figure out how to communicate scrubs to the viewers. I think they guy's name was Inspruker who did a really good job of keeping us up to date even when he was lacking official information. This was back before they were landing the rockets, when we'd wait literally months between Falcon launches.

So SpaceX has had a decade of figuring out what, and how, to inform the viewers. Blue Origin might not be comfortable with that yet.

DriftRegion · a year ago
"if we're adding time to the clock, it means that the team thinks that there might be a possibility that they can sort it out"
whycome · a year ago
Yeah it’s really taking their audience for granted. Not a good first look
fsloth · a year ago
Audience? You mean all the space clients like Nasa, DoD and zillions of new space satellite vendors like IceEye etc? The public stream is nice to have but not critical.

I personally felt it was obvious when the countdown was reset. IMHO the show before countdown from 10s to zero is just filler.

ragebol · a year ago
You know what's a worse look: showing your viewers 1000s of little rockets parts. Looks cool perhaps, but doesn't inspire confidence either.

But damn it's annoying those delays

jjallen · a year ago
The alternative is to not adjust the clock and let it run out and not launch at all then?

Do you really think that’s better?

I don’t.

evil-olive · a year ago
> The alternative is to not adjust the clock and let it run out and not launch at all then?

holy false dichotomy, Batman

mkl · a year ago
The alternative is simply to adjust the clock and say why.
ragebol · a year ago
yellowapple · a year ago
Had a feeling that'd happen when the countdown jumped to T-00:00:00 then disappeared forever.

Oh well.

Laremere · a year ago
If you are reading this in the future, or just prefer YouTube, Edit: Blue origin is streaming it here: https://www.youtube.com/live/OOEPTWQrN7A

Original: the AP is restreaming the launch here: https://www.youtube.com/live/Yb-27DvLcN8?si=W1Qt7DfaSz7yxuL9

purpleidea · a year ago
Same link without site tracking: https://www.youtube.com/live/Yb-27DvLcN8
willvarfar · a year ago
What's the normal vibe on how it feels to work for Bezos on Blue Origin and how does it compare to working for Musk at SpaceX? Is one feeling like startup vs the other feeling like enterprise, or does one feel like the boss is too involved and the other too distant, etc?
_moof · a year ago
Can't speak for Blue but SpaceX felt like an aerospace company, and Musk had next to nothing to do with my day-to-day there.
freeqaz · a year ago
I had a close friend who was at Blue for a few years under Bob Smith (former CEO). It wasn't great. Just a toxic culture it seemed like, and their HQ is a giant stretch fabric tent with terrible acoustics lol
exmadscientist · a year ago
Everyone I know locally who has worked for SpaceX has had pretty negative things to say about it overall.

Everyone I know locally who has worked for Blue Origin has had extremely negative things to say about it, pretty much without qualification.

So, not great!

Deleted Comment

admissionsguy · a year ago
or does one feel like a tech company, the other like a government agency?
whycome · a year ago
This is going to get scrubbed I think. So many pushbacks. They should make scrubbed missions retain the flight designation and the new flight should get a new number.

“Anomalies” “workarounds” “off-nominal situations” “whatever they’re finding that may be a little bit off” are all words you don’t wanna hear at launch I guess.

Okay that’s probably one too many delays now. I’ll have to see if it launches in the morn

baq · a year ago
Nobody would be surprised if they scrubbed today, frankly it'll be more surprising if they launch.

Space is hard.

golol · a year ago
If they stick the landing first try I'm really impressed abd SpaceX has real competition.