Readit News logoReadit News
tracker1 · 3 years ago
Google has only shown time and again, that they cannot be trusted to maintain and support the platforms or tools they create. I just find that I would prefer to avoid them more often than not overall at this point. The things they do keep are monetized in such a way that it's become increasingly disturbing. Not that I'm an Apple advocate, but they're also going down this path now too.

When Microsoft is the least evil of the three, I think the game is pretty much lost, or at least it feels that way.

metadat · 3 years ago
Yes, now I can't help but sit back and chuckle or even laugh out loud with each new Google headline. They are screwing themselves in the long-term, the Google brand is driven into the ground and quickly becoming trash because of their inability to see things through and commit to anything other than Google Ads.

Remember Google+? "This is the future", they said. Now it's deleted. Over and over for so many new products. What a huge waste of time.

As a consumer, Google has become an obviously poor investment of my time.

tracker1 · 3 years ago
Worse is the dozens of communications platforms they've launched, renamed, launched competing platforms and abandoned them all... I've been a Voice user since it was Grand Cetral... TBH, the best time for Google comms was when Hangouts kind of took over text + gvoice and integrated contacts into a shared interface... then they broke it up, reduced features and shuttered it altogether. There have been like 3 since. And that's in a single related space.

Not sure what I'll do if/when they shutter GVoice, probably try to cobble something similar for myself with Twilio, or at least that's my near term plan, only hoping one can create a dialer app for Android that does the same kinds of things.

addicted · 3 years ago
Google+ was the turning point it seems.

I guess once your company culture allows you to U-turn so hard on something you’ve been pushing so much, as Google was Google+, U-turning on anything else becomes super easy.

THENATHE · 3 years ago
If apple would just make iCloud not completely fucking garbage for windows OR support gaming on Mac (even just in the capacity of supporting Vulkan on metal) I would swap today.

I’ve used iPhones and Android Phones for so long I can confidently say I have only three complaints:

Lack of windows support OR gaming support on mac

Apple Maps using yelp is fucking stupid

Not letting all apps use safari extensions

If they could fix those three things, I would literally instantly go out and spend 3000+ dollars on a new top spec MacBook Pro and IPad Pro.

chrischen · 3 years ago
Not sure if Google knows how products are made. They seem to approach everything with a “one-hit wonder” or nothing at all tactic. Contrast with Apple where they decide on the market and iterate until it succeeds. Apple TV was literally a useless box for the first 2-3 years.
helf · 3 years ago
Google does not understand iteration. Like at all. It’s pathetic.
abrookewood · 3 years ago
They seriously feel like a train wreck at this point - company heading in diverging directions, trashed reputation, deprecated services. I really wish they'd get their shit together and provide a viable alternative to AWS and iOS.
epakai · 3 years ago
I think the Google Fi MVNO has been an exception. Pricing might not be as competitive as it used to be, but it doesn't feel questionably monetized. Just an OK plan for people that fit a small niche.
_fat_santa · 3 years ago
Hey Google,

Good luck getting major customers onboard with GCP, no seriously. AWS right now is a clear choice over GCP in terms of company reputation alone. If you go to build a platform on AWS, you can be sure that the product will still exist in a decade (barring some world catastrophe), and that can't be said for GCP.

I get that those are entirely different divisions but overall company reputation matters a ton.

primax · 3 years ago
Ultimately they killed all of GCP when they kept depreciating products and features.

This is despite clients telling them it's a huge block to them investing in using the platform.

Idiots.

1letterunixname · 3 years ago
And summarily laying-off senior GCP support engineers to save a buck.

GCP is what would happen if npm js developers assembled an *aaS stack.

I work at MegaCorp™ and we wouldn't touch GCP with a grounded fiberglass pole.

jamesy0ung · 3 years ago
What’s the point in spending money on a high end chrome book when you can get a similar laptop for a similar price?
finiteseries · 3 years ago
You cannot get a 16” 1600p @ 120hz laptop for anything less than double the cost of that $700 model.

The specs are very specific to gaming, and anything similar (1440p@120hz) will include the cost of the hardware required for local gaming.

panick21_ · 3 years ago
I wont buy one, but the fireware on chromebook is just flat out better and safer. If it was just a standard linux distro by default it would be great.
refulgentis · 3 years ago
OS is much better than Windows and, frankly, macOS at this point. Sort of same analogue as what moving from late XP to Mac OS 10.3 felt like in 2006.

Can you get 120 hz this cheap in Windows laptop?

mdaniel · 3 years ago
> OS is much better than Windows and, frankly, macOS at this point.

... for a discrete set of tasks, maybe. As a general purpose OS, not a prayer. I know Chrome is trying to become its own OS, and seems to be making pretty good headway, but don't cheat yourself thinking "and I'll just ..." unless that task runs in Chrome. I'm aware of the Linux containers on approved devices but just like WSL2 has some grave impedance mismatch with its Windows parent, so too does Linux with its ChromeOS parent

helf · 3 years ago
Hahaha what? Really? ChromeOS is a clusterfuck and to get even remotely useful beyond awful web app functionality requires running proper Linux desktop apps or Android apps.

Which negates the entire point of the OS and you might as well just run a regular desktop Linux where you don’t have to jump through hoops to do things and don’t have Google crammed up your ass.

Mikeb85 · 3 years ago
Good looking device. If you can install a full Linux on it I might get one.

And if not, maybe this'll come along soon: https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/steam-on-chromeos/

hedora · 3 years ago
I am increasingly unable to distinguish The Onion headlines from the actual news.
Gigachad · 3 years ago
Google is an org where the left hand has no idea what the right is doing. The people working on this laptop probably fully expected it to be for stadia and didn’t want to chuck it all in the bin right at the end.
donny2018 · 3 years ago
This would be perfect as a Silicon Valley episode.
mgh2 · 3 years ago
This is clearly a product manager testing the market once they spotted a growing target demographic which all tech companies are chasing after, except Apple due to lack of technical maturation: https://www.macrumors.com/2021/10/18/apple-considered-launch...
pipeline_peak · 3 years ago
“Well this is awkward” title

Is it really that awkward though, like the end of Stadia wasn’t well predicted?

It was a smart move to open Chromebook's support to cloud gaming competitors. Stadia's performance was so poor, had they still supported it, it's hard to tell if it would discourage competitors from releasing on their hardware as well, my guess is it wouldn't.

Moissanite · 3 years ago
Did you ever try Stadia on hardware similar to these laptops? I did, and to be honest I thought performance was excellent. On my Pixel Slate, my 2015 XPS13, and my M2 MacBook Air - all gave great performance with no observable lag or bandwidth issues, even when playing on WiFi and streaming Netflix at the same time over a 76Mb/s connection. The only time the experience degraded was, oddly, when using the Stadia-bundled Chromecast, which even had a wired connection.

Sadly, like basically everyone else, I never trusted Google enough to buy into the ecosystem - and consequently bought a grand total of 1 game.

finiteseries · 3 years ago
It was okay, but solidly last gen. Stadia was always limited to 1080p@60hz, upscaling to 4K at max bitrate of ~45Mbps.

Getting the new MBP actually pushed me to GeForce Now at the time which can hit true 4k@120hz and stream at native Mac resolutions with eg ray tracing in Cyberpunk 2077 now up to 70Mbps, I highly recommend trying it out if you’re still interested in cloud gaming, the difference is quite drastic.

pipeline_peak · 3 years ago
Everything good Google brought to Stadia always came from their strength as an Internet giant. Like Xbox in 2001, superior performance and backing of a large non gaming company didn’t compensate lack of content.

That’s the strongest thing a platform can have.

Apocryphon · 3 years ago
The Stadia fiasco aside, how do the specs look on these machines?
helf · 3 years ago
Pretty OK. But, like, wtf is the point? You’ll be buying a slightly cheaper than a regular laptop laptop with a shitty OS on hardware that will /literally/ have support expiration date assigned to it.

There’s no compelling reason to buy something like this. Unless you are a really basic user who hops on band wagons or is a massive google fanboy for some unfathomable reason.

Apocryphon · 3 years ago
I've been looking to buy a cheap gaming machine, and I've used GeForce Now in the past and quite like it. Though admittedly, I was also looking at Mini PCs and the Steam Deck, so I might be focusing on the wrong targets.