I have been using one for a few months after getting tired of throwing away M570s once a year because the switches wear out.
(By throwing out, I mean tossing in the closet in the hope that one day I'll get around to soldering on new switches.)
Out of the box it was way, way too sensitive. I had to turn down the DPI, which took a few hours of finagling with the firmware. Some of the documentation was a little sparse, and I chased down a few rabbit holes which got frustrating.
Now that it's configured it's mostly usable, but I still struggle with precision compared to the M570. I find myself a few times a week clicking the wrong icon on a bar, or the wrong item in a list. Or my hand tenses up because I'm working extra hard to hone in on the right place on the screen. These are problems that I never had with the old Logitech, and in fact, I still have a working one on the desk that I jump to occasionally when I need real precision.
The M570 has 3 little nylon-looking bearings that the trackball sits on. The Ploopy instead has 3 large wheel shaped rotators. Every once in awhile the trackball will seemingly catch a hitch on the rotators when I'm trying to make precise movements and I'm unable to get where I need it to go unless I make coarse adjustments to move the rotators off the hitch, then back a different path to where I was before, finally to make the precision movements I needed. Not the end of the world, but another minor annoyance. This has happened less lately so it's possible there was a "breaking in period" with the rotators.
Overall it's a decent device and after a few months I am mostly happy with it. Durability is TBD.
> I have been using one for a few months after getting tired of throwing away M570s once a year because the switches wear out.
This seems crazy to me, yet it seems to be ubiquitous. Everybody I talk to about it says their computer mice wear out and have to be replaced after a few years. Meanwhile I've been using the same USB/optical Microsoft Intellimouse for twenty years and it shows no sign of quitting. I've used it hard too, I've dropped it on hardwood and tile floors more times than I can count and the rim of the plastic shell is ringed with microfractures of the plastic, yet it still holds together and never malfunctions.
I think more modern mice must be engineered to fail after a few years. That's the only way I can explain people going through two or three mice a decade when mine lasts several times as long despite the abuse I put it through.
Yes, they do, they are. It sucks. Logitech is the worst. I've bought some of their (not cheapest) mice and they all started double-clicking in 6-12 months!!! And when I tried to resolder switches on my G100 the tracks started to peel off the PCB - and I'm an experienced engineer. I ended up switching switches with a cheap A4Tech lying in a closet. And these still work. Shame on Logitech. In the era of M-SBF96 they were making reliable products.
Hm, yeah. It’s on a different timescale, but I’ve had the same Apple Magic Mouse for just about 6 years and it’s still going strong. At home my (wired) Logitech G502 has been going for longer (but I don’t have a convenient purchase date handy like “starting a job”). Annual mouse purchases do seem a bit crazy.
Does anyone know - is the Logitech MX Ergo more durable than the M570? I, too, have a pile of broken M570s and I'm not sure I want to spend more money on the upgrade if the result will be the same within a year or two.
I have had MX Ergo failing due to switches wearing out after ~3 years of use and several hundred hours of Factorio. Both MX Ergo and M570 share the same D2FC-F-7N switches, so durability should be similar. I've replaced the stock D2FC-F-7N with D2F-01F for over a year and half and it has been working great since.
I have had the same MX Ergo for a few years now; no issues. I went through several M570s before making the switch. In addition to durability I had constant signal issues with my M570s–lag, dropouts, etc–that I do not experience with my Ergo.
I was in the same boat, and I also now swear by the MX Ergo over the M570/M575. I have two complaints with it that (neither of which seems to be addressed by the MX Ergo+): the thing still charges with micro-USB (not a deal-breaker, but it's annoying that I need to keep an adapter or cable around for that one device), and that it's stuck on BT 3.0 (I'd prefer 5.0, as running trackball+keyboard+audio over BT from my old work laptop was enough to cause drop-outs, and 5.0 helps mitigate that).
I ordered one of their Classic models a few weeks ago, it should be here Monday. (They just moved warehouses, so my order was delayed.) I'm really excited for it!
The trackball uses QMK firmware (https://qmk.fm), which is mostly known for powering open-source mechanical keyboards. Customizing it is a breeze, and it's got a whole lot of great functionality built-in too!
Not knocking this product, but I personally prefer a trackball on top with buttons to either side. My thumb get very stressed out using the "on the side" arrangement where the top I can vary how I interact with it more (hover hand, rest a finger on it, flick it with index/middle, etc).
~~Either~~ Both are preferable to the standard mouse for me, though!
I'm similar. I prefer a symmetrical trackball so I can alternate hands and give the other hand a rest. I have been happily using a Kensington Orbit [1] for many years now. It has a scroll ring surrounding the track ball which I also really like. Absolutely love this trackball!
Same here. For this reason, my preferred trackballs have been the L-Trac[0] and more recently the Gameball[1].
The former of those two is built like a tank but lacks buttons (though some models have jacks that allow you to add your own buttons), while the latter is more ergonomic and has more buttons. The Gameball’s capacitive scrolling is nice too.
Same for me, although personally I'd prefer a mouse over thumb-wheel.
I've been using various versions of the Kensington Expert line for the past 20 years. I am on #3 and #4 now (one for home, one for the office). Unfortunately there aren't many good alternatives in this form factor, the X-keys one is probably closest. I am happy with the Experts for the most part just wish there was more competition.
Very much the same here. I had a Logitech thumb trackball that I used for a long time, but my thumb started to twitch uncontrollably and I had to drop it.
I was using it for CAD, so I used it quite a bit all day long, which may have something to do with it.
If your use case works with it, and you're not susceptible to this kind of RSI, thumb trackballs are great. I loved mine.
I switch in between both kinds of trackballs (as you say, thumb or finger) as well as using a regular mouse at times.
My reasoning is that I'm trying to avoid repetitive strain injuries, so by varying my position and the fingers doing the work, I'm basically giving everything time to rest.
I have one of these and it’s by far the most comfortable trackball I use. It took a bit of tweaking the sensitivity to get it to the point I like (it’s very sensitive out of the box) but the firmware’s all free so I can tweak it however I like :)
Longtime trackball user. I'd totally buy one, but they don't sell it in a configuration I like. I wish they'd sell me everything except the shell. I have a 3D printer. I'd rather customize and print my own shell.
I mean, I guess I could get the kit, but then I have a random empty mouse that I need to do something with.
I tried thumballs for years and got never get into them - a fingerball (which ploopy also make) works better for me. I have been using an Elecom HUGE for about a year now: https://elecomus.com/web/product/3271/.
I was looking at the archived version [0], and I had a question.
Regarding their PCB design (visible on the bottom of the page, with additional details here [1], could someone explain why the optic part is separated from the rest of the board by a long, wavy connection?
(I am trying to learn more about PCB design ideas and principles.)
> Regarding their PCB design (visible on the bottom of the page, with additional details here [1], could someone explain why the optic part is separated from the rest of the board by a long, wavy connection?
I think the pcb has to be slightly bent to accommodate the angled position of the track ball. Making it like that helps alleviate stresses on the pcb.
Readit News
(By throwing out, I mean tossing in the closet in the hope that one day I'll get around to soldering on new switches.)
Out of the box it was way, way too sensitive. I had to turn down the DPI, which took a few hours of finagling with the firmware. Some of the documentation was a little sparse, and I chased down a few rabbit holes which got frustrating.
Now that it's configured it's mostly usable, but I still struggle with precision compared to the M570. I find myself a few times a week clicking the wrong icon on a bar, or the wrong item in a list. Or my hand tenses up because I'm working extra hard to hone in on the right place on the screen. These are problems that I never had with the old Logitech, and in fact, I still have a working one on the desk that I jump to occasionally when I need real precision.
The M570 has 3 little nylon-looking bearings that the trackball sits on. The Ploopy instead has 3 large wheel shaped rotators. Every once in awhile the trackball will seemingly catch a hitch on the rotators when I'm trying to make precise movements and I'm unable to get where I need it to go unless I make coarse adjustments to move the rotators off the hitch, then back a different path to where I was before, finally to make the precision movements I needed. Not the end of the world, but another minor annoyance. This has happened less lately so it's possible there was a "breaking in period" with the rotators.
Overall it's a decent device and after a few months I am mostly happy with it. Durability is TBD.
This seems crazy to me, yet it seems to be ubiquitous. Everybody I talk to about it says their computer mice wear out and have to be replaced after a few years. Meanwhile I've been using the same USB/optical Microsoft Intellimouse for twenty years and it shows no sign of quitting. I've used it hard too, I've dropped it on hardwood and tile floors more times than I can count and the rim of the plastic shell is ringed with microfractures of the plastic, yet it still holds together and never malfunctions.
I think more modern mice must be engineered to fail after a few years. That's the only way I can explain people going through two or three mice a decade when mine lasts several times as long despite the abuse I put it through.
Here’s to hopefully finishing up the decade!
https://twitter.com/__mharrison__/status/1515078064866091009
The trackball uses QMK firmware (https://qmk.fm), which is mostly known for powering open-source mechanical keyboards. Customizing it is a breeze, and it's got a whole lot of great functionality built-in too!
One of the big things that pushed me to Ploopy is the use of roller bearings, although now I see there's a ball-transfer-unit mod which is basically the ideal form of bearing for this: https://github.com/ploopyco/classic-trackball/tree/master/ha...
~~Either~~ Both are preferable to the standard mouse for me, though!
[1] https://www.kensington.com/p/products/electronic-control-sol...
[1] https://www.kensington.com/p/products/electronic-control-sol...
The former of those two is built like a tank but lacks buttons (though some models have jacks that allow you to add your own buttons), while the latter is more ergonomic and has more buttons. The Gameball’s capacitive scrolling is nice too.
[0]: https://www.amazon.com/CST2545-5W-Ambidextrous-Performance-E... [1]: https://www.gamingtrackball.com/
I've been using various versions of the Kensington Expert line for the past 20 years. I am on #3 and #4 now (one for home, one for the office). Unfortunately there aren't many good alternatives in this form factor, the X-keys one is probably closest. I am happy with the Experts for the most part just wish there was more competition.
I was using it for CAD, so I used it quite a bit all day long, which may have something to do with it.
If your use case works with it, and you're not susceptible to this kind of RSI, thumb trackballs are great. I loved mine.
My reasoning is that I'm trying to avoid repetitive strain injuries, so by varying my position and the fingers doing the work, I'm basically giving everything time to rest.
https://ploopy.co/classic-trackball/
I mean, I guess I could get the kit, but then I have a random empty mouse that I need to do something with.
I’d happily buy the non printed parts too.
Regarding their PCB design (visible on the bottom of the page, with additional details here [1], could someone explain why the optic part is separated from the rest of the board by a long, wavy connection?
(I am trying to learn more about PCB design ideas and principles.)
Thanks!
[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20220313204334/https://ploopy.co... [1] https://github.com/ploopyco/thumb-trackball/blob/main/hardwa...
I think the pcb has to be slightly bent to accommodate the angled position of the track ball. Making it like that helps alleviate stresses on the pcb.
You can see it a bit more clearly on the sister product page: https://ploopy.co/mini-trackball/