Readit News logoReadit News
lapetitejort · 4 years ago
> The applicant can show their monthly income is equivalent to 1,000,000 ISK, or 1,300,000 ISK if applying for an accompanying spouse, cohabiting partner, and children under the age of 18.

That comes out to about $96k USD a year. Totally reachable for a SWE-type job, however I know fully remote workers who are far from this amount. I guess they just want people to come and throw money around the bars.

cko · 4 years ago
I assume the reason is more banal - that Iceland is a high cost of living country. I can't imagine groceries to be very cheap. So after those high basic expenses, I'm sure there needs to be enough fun money left over to throw at the Icelandic economy.
ohashi · 4 years ago
I went probably 5 years ago and found it to be one of the most expensive places I've ever been. I lived in the Nordics for years, I've been to around 50 countries. The only other country that I felt gave it a run for the money in terms of my spending was Norway. I was a tourist, so lots of eating at restaurants, no cooking, but average meal for a basic drink + entre out I was averaging ~$50. I think you're right about the costs, it's a very high COL place and they probably don't want to encourage cheap backpacker type nomads who don't add a whole lot to the economy.
MattGaiser · 4 years ago
I had a friend travel to Iceland. She was a student, so doing it on the cheap. Didn't eat a lot while there as the food was so expensive.
vmception · 4 years ago
They want non-EU persons that dont need a visa who are already making at least $96k/yr remotely

They know what they’re doing :) who is left? U and S

m3adow · 4 years ago
You shouldn't forget about Canada and especially the UK now that they brexited.
Handytinge · 4 years ago
Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, the UK, etc etc.

There's a lot of countries out there with high earners who aren't in the EU or USA ;).

mr90210 · 4 years ago
Well said!

Deleted Comment

jwilliams · 4 years ago
Cypress, Portugal and Malta offer similar (arguably better) schemes for Digital Nomads [0]. Portugal has been particularly aggressive to the point they offer zero tax on crypto for their "Golden Visa" [1].

I know of a few people using Malta as a base to nomad around Europe.

0: https://www.mondaq.com/uk/employee-rights-labour-relations/1...

1: https://getgoldenvisa.com/crypto-portugal

codingkev · 4 years ago
Cyprus is probably the best overall deal out there right now, but it isn't the cheapest option.
mr90210 · 4 years ago
Exactly what I thought. Portugal is a better deal for sure.
mmstan · 4 years ago
So this is long-term visa which:

1) Is not visa, you have to not need visa for Iceland to qualify 2) Is not long term, it's valid up to 180 days

On the other hand, they recognize remote workers which kind of fit somewhere in between tourists and people who come to work, which many other countries don't.

trcarney · 4 years ago
It is a visa. Iceland offers visa free travel for many countries for the purposes of tourism. I haven’t looked at Iceland’s program but normally these programs are for 30-90 days. Therefore 180 days would be considered a long term tourist visa.
SkyPuncher · 4 years ago
Most tourist visa's do not allow you to work (even remotely). I'm sure tons of people do it, but this is basically allowing people to legally "travel" the country for 6 months while explicitly working.
digianarchist · 4 years ago
To my knowledge only the UK, Australia and Canada will allow remote work on a visitor visa with the caveat that the business must be based outside the country.
jzymbaluk · 4 years ago
3) is only available to citizens of mostly EU nations [1]

[1] https://utl.is/index.php/en/eea-efta-citizens-and-their-rela...

Maybe this is my American ignorance shining through here, but I didn't realize Iceland was not a member of the EU

EduardoBautista · 4 years ago
It has the specific requirement of _not_ being an EU citizen.
sofixa · 4 years ago
> Maybe this is my American ignorance shining through here, but I didn't realize Iceland was not a member of the EU

Yep, only the European Economic area, like Norway. As with them, a big reason is stuff around fishing.

occamrazor · 4 years ago
The webpage specifies that it is _not_ available to citizens of EU/EFTA countries. In fact they can already work remotely from Iceland without any visa requirement, thanks to Freedom of Movement agreements.
CalRobert · 4 years ago
It is, however, part of Schengen. An understandable mistake.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceland%E2%80%93European_Union...

paxys · 4 years ago
Not really as big a deal as people are making it out to be. Iceland allows 90 day tourist stays, this simply doubles it to 180 days. Everything else is the same.

In fact, if my options are to just jump on a plane without any thought and go for a 0-3 month trip vs file a ton of paperwork, get approved and go for a 3-6 month trip, I'll probably pick the former.

Dead Comment

Ansil849 · 4 years ago
Buried in the FAQ, but pretty significant:

> An applicant for a long-term visa needs to show proof of health insurance coverage of 2,000,000 ISK as a minimum per person, which is 1) valid in Iceland | Schengen-area 2) valid for the duration of their stay in Iceland. If your insurance is not valid in Iceland, please see our Health Insurance page for a list of providers.

shtopointo · 4 years ago
A great migration will happen soon as more cash/resource-starved countries will open their doors like this to international talent.

It will start a competition amongst countries to get the best talent in their borders.

For Iceland this will be a net win. Even if the people coming in don't pay taxes, their mere presence in the local economy for a few extra months per year could mean the difference between Iceland building another road or not.

Very impressive step from Iceland!

Deleted Comment

throwaway22032 · 4 years ago
For everyone discussing the 1M thing:

The median Icelandic salary is approx 600,000 ISK for context. So it's higher than the median, but not insane by any means.

It seems logical to me that you'd only want to grant visas to people who are "above average".

nebula8804 · 4 years ago
Dumb question...but is this considering income before or after taxes?
mmstan · 4 years ago
Since tax situation is usually very different for different people and in different tax jurisdictions, it would be safe to say that this is considered income before taxes.
codingkev · 4 years ago
I guess they just want well off people who leave their $$$ in the local economy for half a year. Fair enough, but not a very impressive deal.

For comparison: Georgia (the country) offers a 360 day visa free entry for almost every country out there, no paperwork required. While the standard of living in Georgia is certainly lower, the nature there is much more diverse and just many more things to do.