That's true, but the solution I suggested works to sort on the last column, whether or not there are exactly 4 columns. I avoided having to count how many columns there are, assuming only that the date comes last.
But yes, if you know the date is in the 4th column then your solution also works.
Anyone around to convert this to that nushell that was featured on HN a few weeks ago? I'm curious to see what the comparison would look like in a super practical real-life scenario
Go! and Go are two different languages. Read the last section of the wikipedia page for Go! listed above for their objections against Google for picking that name.
Some of these have confusing type fields. Like asterius-compiler which is a "compiler", but apparently not a programming language? It seems pretty loose at what constitutes a "computer language", with numeralSystems, cloud, non-programmable text editors, and mathematical notation among other strange entries.
It feels like there needs to be some kind of cutoff on what we're calling a language here. Maybe if it is Turing Complete? I mean JPEG might be considered a language in some ways, in that it encodes data and the computer has to parse it, but I wouldn't normally classify it as a language.
Thank you for the feedback! The categories are a loose grouping. In the future there should be a lot more columns so will be better ways to cluster and view groupings.
I don't see Chef [1] which was part of the MIT Mystery Hunt many years ago. If you have ever told anyone that programming and/or algorithms are just following steps like a cooking recipe, you should read about it. I don't think there was even an interpreter back then, so you had to "execute" the program by hand.
There are a lot of entries that don't have dates. If you want to remove them, pipe the result through:
But yes, if you know the date is in the 4th column then your solution also works.
Deleted Comment
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go!_(programming_language)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAL_Actor_Languagehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TempleOS [HolyC]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Portable_Intermediate... [SPIR]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refer_(software)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RuneScape#History_and_developm... [RuneScript]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulkan_(API)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DokuWiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible_(software)
It's lists c-- correctly, so I don't know why C++ would be any different.
It feels like there needs to be some kind of cutoff on what we're calling a language here. Maybe if it is Turing Complete? I mean JPEG might be considered a language in some ways, in that it encodes data and the computer has to parse it, but I wouldn't normally classify it as a language.
[1] https://esolangs.org/wiki/Chef
There are a lot of esolangs still to add. It's helpful to have people recommend noteworthy ones.
Then, T3X was invented in 1995. And Klong in 2015.
Would be nice to have an interactive browseable/searchable/sortable graph with additional data such as year of release.
https://codelani.com/languages/simons-basic.html
Wow!