It does sound like communication with the manager was poor, though. The manager should have been more empathetic to their situation (depends heavily on how comfortable the employee was with giving out this information).
It does sound like communication with the manager was poor, though. The manager should have been more empathetic to their situation (depends heavily on how comfortable the employee was with giving out this information).
Maybe the fix for this would be to have a language/library combination designed from the ground up to make it as easy as possible?
So for example, the language would come as standard with:
- a web server for production use - a web server for development use - a built-in SQL database - a built-in NoSQL database - a web server library
Then, as all the components for the system would part of the language's standard library/environment, the difficulty of configuring/running a server (such as a web server) on another machine would be limited.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160229-the-sea-nomad-ch...
The general public buy the game, and find if you want to play as Darth Vader or Han Solo unlocking them costs $20 each.
If Droidscript required unknown sources to do anything (not just APK exports), then other apps could check the unknown sources policy on the device and disable certain intents (which they may do anyway at the moment, since that would mean that the applications installed may be untrustworthy). But this way there isn't any way to tell.
This is a poor assumption to make. Any data coming into your application should be assumed to be malicious. This would be the same as a server just accepting any data made to its API calls without any validation.
- Terribly slow startup and load times.
- no support for mobile devices just with some app.
- While it can do lots of things with plugins they tend to kill performance which might cause artifacts on the print.
- slow on updates, they ware on Python 2.x until this year.
I'm currently migrating to mainsail (https://github.com/meteyou/mainsail), which looks much better.
If you're the type of person that needs the _fastest_ computer then yeah obviously you're upgrading every year. Or if you work on large codebases, etc.
But if you don't care about that, you can easily go 4+ years with your laptop. Yes computers have gotten faster, but the internet is still usable on a 10 year old machine.
I've replaced my battery once already, but consider your keyboard/screen are likely things to break at any point in time with accidents.
And we're comparing this to apple, a company that has been basically DRM'ing components - even if you can buy the replacement you can't use it without it being "programmed" by apple.
EDIT: Also note that the bare minimum models from 10 years ago are likely too slow nowadays, I mean to compare this to the medium-upper range devices of the time, potentially with relatively low cost upgrades like an SSD.