This makes me wanna buy a 3d printer and play with it!

Well, this certainly exceeded my expectations.

I asked for "something cute" and got a cute panda. I asked it to make its eyes bigger, and it did.

It wasn't a clean model by any means, but damn, pretty good considering I can probably fix this up faster than I could create it from 0.

You can insert scanned object into OpenSCAD, but it is just a surface map and very easily the model becomes too large. Is this problem now solved?

wdyt about zoo.dev? they seems getting a lot resources like funding

I was briefly excited, because "Can you take this file and make it solid" is a use-case I have for turning wargaming terrain meant to be at one scale to be more generally scalable.

Sadly, this appears to be a no go.

I quite like the product and it has appeared just as I need it, I am struggling with designing a case for a project right now via fusion.

I have noticed that the tool does not do quite what I want it to. It reminds me of MidJourney a couple years ago. I might have to build a workflow where I design parts in Adam and arrange them in other tools. As details I supply for arrangement appear to being applied to individual parts.

Do you have any language that is getting better results than others?

Oh, did not see the parametric toggle. User failure. Thanks.

Error Compiling Model — "Fix with AI?" — Okay — Hmmm.... only the top is truncated. (Seems to have done an "Optimized Tetrahedron"?)

Oh, I don't think you guys should even expose it other than in the export feature. "Export Optimized" or "Export for Game Engines".

I think Mixamo nailed the autorigging years ago. Anything similar to that is good enough. If you guys want to go fancy, check out Cascadeur and what they are doing. For a cool skinning algo, you might want to check voxel heat difusing:

https://github.com/meshonline/Surface-Heat-Diffuse-Skinning

What about painting/iterating on the model, while respecting the UV constraints and boundaries of the original texture, is that on the roadmap?

super curious,how are you handling constraint resolution under the hood when user modifies via prompt vs direct manipulation? are you maintaining a shared parametric model or diffing against a scene graph? also how’s geometry validation handled postgen to avoid non-manifold trash?

Somewhat related, but I'd love GPT enabled multi-physics simulations on objects. Designing in CAD, especially for intricate objects seems (currently) to be better when done by "hand", but I'd absolutely love to use speech-to-text to run different simulations on said objects.