Probably from IP address geolocation.

I'd guess the majority of those issues are rusted brake disks. You don't need the regular disc brake very often in an electric car.

I would love to evaluate the privacy of these technologies.

Someone reply with a link to the source code so I can see exactly what it is doing, without having to take an internet rando's word for it.

Better yet, let me compile it myself.

The drawings are nice, but like other SPAs, it is useless as a resource because it does not use bookmarkable URLs

Here is another funny illustration — https://modem.io/blog/blog-monetization/

>when they replied almost immediately after with a video of the relevant workflow

Wow. Such wrong claims.

I had already replied to you in a sibling comment, refuting your points, but will give one more proof (not that I really need to):

_acco, the top level commenter relevant to this discussion, commented at some time, say x.

layer8 commented, replying to _acco, 7 hours ago (as can be seen on the page at the time of my writing this comment, i.e. right now).

I then replied to layer8, 6 hours ago.

_acco replied back to layer8 5 hours ago.

All this is visible right now on the page; and if people check it a few hours later, the relative time deltas will remain the same, obviously. (But not if they check after 24 hours, in which case all comments will show as one day ago.)

So there was a 1 hour gap between layer8's comment and mine, and a 2 hour gap between layer8's comment and _acco's reply.

If you think 2 hours is the same as "almost immediately", as you said above, I have nothing more to say to you, except that our perceptions of time are highly different.

That wouldn't be considered a timestamp in my book. For starters, it doesn't have time information, only date information. Quickly asking ChatGPT it gives this answer: In computing, timestamps are commonly expressed in formats like "YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss" (year-month-day hour:minute:second).

When pressed about this particular time detail, ChatGPT elaborates: While "YYYY-MM-DD" is a common date format, it's not complete for a timestamp, which typically includes both date and time information. A complete timestamp might look like "YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm:ss" to include hours, minutes, and seconds.

So, no, this post doesn't contain a timestamp, and it already fails in its own advice.

  <meta property="article:modified_time" content="2023-11-15T13:40:37+01:00">
  <meta property="article:published_time" content="2023-11-15T10:12:30+01:00">

Which one?