Readit News logoReadit News
whymememe commented on Bill Atkinson's psychedelic user interface   patternproject.substack.c... · Posted by u/cainxinth
colecut · 2 months ago
I tripped a lot in my early 20s, a whole lot, and never had a bad time. Well, I had some uncomfortable experiences, but not what I can now call a bad trip.

One of my first times after, in my experience, I literally went to hell. I was convinced I was on the outskirts, all the people at the party around me were demons, I was about to be tortured forever, and I was never going to see my son again and he was going to grow up without me..

I convinced myself I was in that position because I had wrecked and killed someone, and my punishment was forever replaying the experiencing of a life where I would grow up to have a son, only to have him ripped away from me, reminded of what I did, and then tortured for some nearly eternal amount of time....

Any conversations people had with me at the time, I heard the words they were saying but completely twisted the meaning of the words to fit whatever crazy narrative was going on in my head.

This has happened 4 or 5 times. Despite being familiar with the experience, in my mind it just reinforces that I am in a "loop" at the time, about to be tortured again..

It's happened with LSD, Mushrooms, and surprisingly even ketamine. *edit it also happened during an intense changa experience with a shaman in Tijuana, which was my most intense experience with anything to date..

You'd think I would not take this stuff anymore =p I have at least slowed down considerably...

whymememe · 2 months ago
I have had an incredibly similar experience, including falling back into being convinced I was in a 'loop' when my mind was tired or on psychedelics. I've always found it interesting how common this type of bad trip is and wondered if there's a reason why it's so common. Cultural context can have a large impact on the type of trips you have, but I would not have guessed that western culture would create this type of bad trip, in particular.
whymememe commented on Huawei releases an open weight model trained on Huawei Ascend GPUs   arxiv.org/abs/2505.21411... · Posted by u/buyucu
whymememe · 2 months ago
???

I haven’t seen the narrative that Ukraine is winning the war for at least 2 years. You should maybe choose better news sources, there’s a huge amount of very accurate reporting on it.

Additionally, the Russian economy is a wartime economy, which runs hot till it collapses or wins. It’ll be fine till it’s not, but it’s very hard to predict what that point is.

whymememe commented on The Lost Art of Research as Leisure   kasurian.com/p/research-a... · Posted by u/altilunium
thinkingtoilet · 5 months ago
I always love this conversation:

Snob: "Listening to an audio book doesn't count as reading the book!"

Everyone else in the world: "k"

whymememe · 5 months ago
To be pedantic, it’s definitionally not reading. You listened to the book, you didn’t read it.

There’s just an odd legitimacy associated specifically with reading - that people want to access, and so makes other people weirdly snobbish/defensive of it.

whymememe commented on The Mythology of Work (2018)   crimethinc.com/2018/09/03... · Posted by u/robtherobber
drbig · 7 months ago
I remember reading an article based on a paper that tried to replicate small-scale hunter-gatherer "week". It turned out that "work" was less than 20h per week.

As in: about two days of necessary hunting-gathering was enough to sustain the group for the remaining five days. The rest of the week was for maintenance and leisure (so it's not like five days of staring at the sky; it just that work done during that time was _not necessary to immediate survival_).

That's anyways what I remember.

whymememe · 7 months ago
That’s quite a controversial figure actually. The original paper that popularised this was the ‘Original affluent society’ paper by Marshall Sahlins. It marked a big shift away from the paradigm at the time, that saw hunter gatherers as having ‘Nasty, brutal and short’ lives.

The research that essay was largely based off was somewhat flawed though as it ignored time in camp processing food and crafting. So it only considered time spent actively hunting/foraging as work.

I say ‘somewhat flawed’ because work is a modern concept and applying it to a hunter gatherer context is quite difficult and comes with big debates on what is/isn’t work.

whymememe commented on Hotel booking sites overcharge Bay Area customers   sfgate.com/travel/article... · Posted by u/ekelsen
janalsncm · 8 months ago
People really take Adam Smith way too seriously. He lived at a time when the economy was made up of independent artisans not people working for large multinational corporations. If markets were really so good at regulating themselves why were any government standards necessary at all?

The reality is, every product has an asymmetry of information, and the more complex it is, the higher the asymmetry. And you can’t determine the quality of a product until you buy it. And determining quality takes time, which is a limited resource.

> the business will rightly fail

In reality, what stops bad behavior is regulation because in reality, people do not have infinite time and infinite information to assess each thing they consume.

whymememe · 8 months ago
Adam Smith is often used as symbol of laissez-faire capitalism but was explicitly a proponent for regulation in situations where the market failed, such as this one imagine.

What you probably mean is that people take the concept of the invisible hand too seriously. Which was a relatively minor point in the book, and has somehow been magnified to the point of absurdity by the economic and political trends of the last 40 years.

Adam smith is way more reasonable than you’d think, given how he’s portrayed in the modern era.

whymememe commented on NASA freezes Starliner missions   gizmodo.com/nasa-freezes-... · Posted by u/rntn
nickpp · 10 months ago
Yes. All he has to do is walk into a hospital or detox center and he’ll have access to medical care King Henry VIII could not buy with all his riches.

> opiate addict

Indeed, we don’t have the technology to save people from themselves, yet. I am sure kings of old didn’t either and addicts of their time fared even worse.

whymememe · 10 months ago
I understand your point but all the resources and material goods in the world don’t matter if you can’t access them.

> Indeed, we don’t have the technology to save people from themselves, yet.

The plight of the poorest in today’s societies is far more of a social and political issue than a technological one. An issue America is particularly bad on, despite all its affluence.

whymememe commented on NASA freezes Starliner missions   gizmodo.com/nasa-freezes-... · Posted by u/rntn
nickpp · 10 months ago
The poorest people of today's developed countries are countless times richer than the kings of old - in terms of the products and services they have access to. Medicine, communication, transportation, entertainment - we can't even compare.
whymememe · 10 months ago
The poorest?

So the homeless opiate addict living under a city bypass is better off than King Henry VIII?

Someone should tell them.

u/whymememe

KarmaCake day6October 22, 2024View Original