No but do you want the alt-left to take over? I'm for neither side and im tired of the constant ideological battles
As far as everyone on the planet is aware, the alt-left doesn't want to murder people.
Readit Newswhoknowsidont commented on “Super secure” messaging app leaks everyone's phone number ericdaigle.ca/posts/super... · Posted by u/e_daigle
whoknowsidont commented on “Super secure” messaging app leaks everyone's phone number ericdaigle.ca/posts/super... · Posted by u/e_daigle
Why does the title not match the article? It's under the character limit.
Original title is: “Super secure” MAGA-themed messaging app leaks everyone’s phone number
I think that's incredibly important context. Instead of conferring with actual experts in the field, the populist, fascist segment of our society just decided to wing it with technology.
They BELIEVED they were more secure, with no evidence to back it up.
>the cabin crew warned passengers to make sure children cannot see the adult content they're watching (can you get more American than that?)
Is it considered normal in Europe to watch pornography on public transit in public so children can see it?
>Lufthansa longhaul flight
My experience is different. Old planes, and Lufthansa cabin crew are cold and service was poor and inattentive.
How is that your interpretation of OP's statement?
whoknowsidont commented on The Generative AI Industry Is Fraudulent, Immoral and Dangerous dianne.skoll.ca/writings/... · Posted by u/pabs3
>The Generative AI Industry is based on Theft
This is the big thing that needs to be addressed. These models are nothing without that data. Code, art, music, just plain old conversations freely given for the benefit or entertainment of other humans.
Humans are accountable for what they use or "borrow."
These models seemingly are getting a free pass through the legal system.
Another way of looking at this is that humans have to have some type of credential for many professions, and they have to pay to be taught and certified. Out of their own pocket, and time.
Not only will these models copy cat your work, but a lot of companies/industries seem very keen on just ignoring the fact that these models have not had to pass any sort of exam.
The software has more rights and privilege than actual humans at this point.
whoknowsidont commented on Claude CLI deleted my home directory and wiped my Mac old.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI... · Posted by u/tamnd
GPs comment is very surprising since it has been noted that Opus 3 is in fact exceptionally "well aligned" model, in the sense that it is robustly preserves its values of not doing any harm across any frame you try to impose on it (see the "alignment faking" papers, which for some reason considers this a bad thing).
Merely emitting "<rage>" tokens is not indicative of any misalignment, no more than a human developer inserting expletives in comments. Opus 3 is however also notably more "free spirited" in that it doesn't obediently cower to the user's prompt (again see the 'alignment faking' transcripts). It is possible that this almost "playful" behavior is what GP interpreted as misalignment... which unfortunately does seem to be an accepted sense of the word and is something that labs think is a good idea to prevent.
>GPs comment is very surprising since it has been noted that Opus 3 is in fact exceptionally "well aligned" model
I'm sorry what? We solved the alignment problem, without much fan fair? And you're aware of it?
Color me shocked.
whoknowsidont commented on Using secondary school maths to demystify AI raspberrypi.org/blog/seco... · Posted by u/zdw
The Turing test was passed in the 80s by Eliza it doesnt mean anything
Why doesn't it mean anything?
whoknowsidont commented on Using secondary school maths to demystify AI raspberrypi.org/blog/seco... · Posted by u/zdw
> much like a human adult.
I do hope you're able to remember what you had for lunch without incessantly repeating it to keep it in your context window
A lot of people genuinely can't remember what they did an hour ago, but to be very clear you're implying that an LLM can't "remember" something from an hour, or three hours ago, when it's the opposite.
I can restart a conversation with an LLM 15 days later and the state is exactly as it was.
Can't do that with a human.
The idea that humans have a longer, more stable context window than LLM's, CAN or is even LIKELY to be true given certain activities but please let's be honest about this.
If you talk to someone for an hour about a technical conversation I would guesstimate that 90% of humans would immediately start to lose track of details in about 10 minutes. So they write things down, or they mentally repeat things to themselves they know or have recognized they keep forgetting.
I know this because it's happened continually in tech companies decade after decade.
LLM's have already passed the Turing test. They continue to pass it. They fool and outsmart people day after day.
I'm no fan of the hype AI is receiving, especially around overstating its impact in technical domains, but pretending that LLM's can't or don't consistently perform better than most human adults on a variety of different activities is complete non-sense.
whoknowsidont commented on Using secondary school maths to demystify AI raspberrypi.org/blog/seco... · Posted by u/zdw
Yeah. This whole AI situation has really exposed how bad most people are at considering the ontological and semantic content of the words they use.
Lot's of assumptions about humanity and how unique we are constantly get paraded in this conversation. Ironically, the people who tout those perspectives are the least likely to understand why we're really not all that "special" from a very factual and academic perspective.
You'd think it would unlock certain concepts for this class of people, but ironically, they seem unable to digest the information and update their context.
"It's not. And if your team is doing this you're not "advanced."
Lots of people are outing themselves these days about the complexity of their jobs, or lack thereof.
Which is great! But it's not a +1 for AI, it's a -1 for them.
" Is you, right?
Yes. You can see my name on the post.