Experts say
Readit NewsDeleted Comment
schmuckonwheels commented on Notes on Apple's Nano Texture (2025) jon.bo/posts/nano-texture... · Posted by u/dsr12
glossy screens are better for visual clarity, especially contrast (reduces eye strain when reading text)
Yes the visual clarity of staring into a reflection of my own shirt, and any light within 10m.
There is no worse eye strain that looking at anything that isn't supposed to be on the screen. It's 90% noise.
schmuckonwheels commented on Notes on Apple's Nano Texture (2025) jon.bo/posts/nano-texture... · Posted by u/dsr12
I've been saying glossy screens are pure cancer for 20 years and every time I was dismissed as a Luddite that should get with the times.
Now they can sell you "nano texture" at a premium after getting you hooked on functionally terrible displays (they look pretty in the store though).
My worst experience with glossy displays was when I had to perform some work outside on a sunny day and I comically could not see a single thing. It looked like a pure black square. I laughed, packed up and left, and told my boss it wasn't happening.
Deleted Comment
schmuckonwheels commented on Beebo, a wave simulator written in C git.sr.ht/~willowf/beebo/... · Posted by u/anon25783
Rest in peace, Sky King.
schmuckonwheels commented on Inside The Internet Archive's Infrastructure hackernoon.com/the-long-n... · Posted by u/dvrp
Here's some photos I took a long time ago.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/textfiles/albums/7215763372220...
That's great. Ask and ye shall receive.
What's most surprising is churches notoriously have really sketchy electrical. There had to be some renovation in that regard, right?
Sure. Not being hacked is good for business.
Keep in mind that google is primarily a cloud business. That means that they take on a lot more of a risk, as when they are hacked its a them problem vs traditional software where its much more the customer's problem. Security is very much about incentives, and the incentives line up better for google to do the right thing.
It's more about when Google assumed full control of the cloud, the browser, the OS, and everything in between they self-appointed themselves as the unelected standards board of the Internet, and forced everyone else to follow their whims and timelines. Some of which are completely insane.
>It is very economical and hard to compromise at a scale that has any effect.
Vote-by-mail creates unnecessary opportunities for cheating, irregularities, and all sorts of foolishness. If you can fill in the bubbles, you could theoretically fill them in for other people. People living with parents suffering from dementia could fill out their ballots without them knowing and vote multiple times. You don't even need a valid signature; states allow witnesses to vouch. Ballot boxes get vandalized. Ballot harvesting is rampant. There's so many problems. It's for the same reason universities don't allow take-home exams.
Vote-by-mail states are open targets for mockery (and rightfully so) as it routinely takes days or weeks to count all the ballots and declare a winner. Third-world backwaters can do it in the same night. This is a solved problem.
Whenever vote-by-mail is criticized, people get really upset. How do you think the other states do it? The argument about not being able to take off on election day doesn't hold water. Most states allow early voting for weeks. If you can find time to visit a post office or ballot box, you can certainly go to the library or a church basement for the 5 minutes it takes to fill in the bubbles, stick it in the machine and you absolutely know it's counted. And results will be available election night.