But do we need 20 companies copying each other and doing the same thing?
Like, is that really competition? I'd say competition is when you do something slightly different, but I guess it's subjective based on your interpretation of what is a commodity and what is proprietary.
To my view, everyone is outright copying and creating commodity markets:
OpenAI: The OG, the Coke of Modern AI
Claude: The first copycat, The Pepsi of Modern AI
Mistral: Euro OpenAI
DeepSeek: Chinese OpenAI
Grok/xAI: Republican OpenAI
Google/MSFT: OpenAI clone as a SaaS or Office package.
Meta's Llama: Open Source OpenAI
etc...
Some AIs will be good at coding (perhaps in a particular language or ecosystem), some at analyzing information and churning out a report for you, and some will be better at operating in physical spaces.
This would sidestep the problem of:
> but what about all the stuff in the middle
Are there any serious objections to that line of reasoning?