Readit NewsI mean, I imagine the main problem here is that you can't close your credit card because the bank now says you owe them that money, right? If it were a debit card, that would never be a problem.
EDIT:
> I've even requested a new credit card from the bank, however the bank continues to forward AWS charges to me.
They forwarded from one card to another? AWS charged a closed card and the bank forwarded it? Sounds like you need to close the client account (your whole client relationship with the bank), not the card.
EDIT 3: Or do you mean that you requested a new card without closing the old one? If they're both open, it's not that charges are being forwarded, but rather that the old card is still valid and both are linked to the same credit account. Maybe you can ask them to close it?
EDIT 2:
> Nor will Amazon simply remove the credit card number that I can provide them.
By the way, if you can't authenticate with Amazon as the rightful owner of that account, it sounds unreasonable for them to comply to a stranger asking them to simply remove a credit card number of some account.
Yup.
> By the way, if you can't authenticate with Amazon as the rightful owner of that account, it sounds unreasonable for them to comply to a stranger asking them to simply remove a credit card number of some account.
I disagree. If I can provide a full credit card number, they should be able to remove it from all accounts. Either the card is compromised, or I'm telling the truth.
Though I quickly realized it wasn't such a bad idea at all, for exactly the reasons such as this. Even I mess up domains sometimes, so I usually tend to use Google instead except for the ones I know by heart (or have bookmarked).
Greatly discusses the legal trouble his film caused.
The ends with him agreeing how the film sucks and maybe the prosecutor was right! (EDIT: he says this as a joke, apparently this needs to be pointed out?)
...
I get it. That’s a good story and he absolutely does come off as a likable guy.
> The ends with him agreeing how the film sucks and maybe the prosecutor was right!
He says that, only as a joke that it's so bad it should've been illegal. While in reality a great mis-justice was done to the man, and he was railroaded into accepting a plea-deal due to the gravity of the unfair charges.
Regardless of the rightness or wrongness of the actions of the family in question, that seems somewhat perverse.
which I think shows charging $2k for a few weeks worth of texts is pretty unconscionable
I'm not enthused about supporting anything that worsens the global climate crisis and its irresponsible of large companies to support cryptocurrencies with its terrible power usage right now.