You could argue that the latter is the core drive to evolve the standard.
Does anyone know if that’s true? Gartner calls that whole arm of the business “insights” and doesn’t break it down further in their SEC filings.
I’d be surprised if that’s the case.
Our strategy so far has been to let them starve and tell them to "learn to code" or "become a machine operator/technician", but that strategy can only help so many people. We do not need as many technicians as laborers that the machine replaced.
And when you have a mass of people who see that the future globalist economy is moving in a way that has no place for them, or plan to make sure they don't starve, you get the globalism backlash like what's happening in the US and UK over the last decade, and nationalistic pandering politicians taking advantage.
The only solution is to tax the billionare owners of the job-displacing machines to provide basic living UBI to the people they replaced.
https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Pe...
That’s kind of insane if you think about it.
A “standard” getting semi-monthly updates via random Databricks-affiliated GitHub accounts doesn’t really fit that bill.
Look at something like this:
https://github.com/delta-io/delta/blob/master/PROTOCOL.md#wr...
Ouch.
(Would be genuinely excited if the answer is yes.)