The first rule is you don't chase it. Just sit still for an hour or two. The deer will bed down in nearby trees and bleed out.
Edit: oops, wait! I forgot to smile.
How much do you listen to their opinion?
(Unless of course that matches your manager to a T).
Unfortunately, reality does not make the greatest dissident.
The problem is that scientists think their knowledge is truth because it comes from "the scientific method." They fail to internalize that the whole point of that method is that no knowledge is sacred and everything should be doubted to the degree at which evidence exists to the contrary.
A crackpot conspiracy theory with a single anecdotal source of data is sufficient to create doubt in the soundest of theories. Just not much.
Given that, as you will expect, hiring teams we need to process a lot of applications and make snap decisions. You need to ensure you rise to the top by
- Keeping your CV brief and relevant
- Making it clear what things you specifically did in previous roles and their benefits
- Make it clear (e.g. in a side panel) your abilities and how they match the role you are applying for.
But yes, it's hard. The days of applicants getting ten job offers at once are over for now. At least outside AI and outside of senior positions.
Namely:
- what schemes are still left for us to pull a lot of money into before they get recognized as scams
- how do we get out in time to leave someone else holding the bag
They paid me to design an eventually consistent, self-healing data store with a cache layer / write ahead log, with peers determined by paxos consensus, transfers metered by finops and govered with kademlia, and a storage layer capable of byzantine fault tolerance, which we implemented via signature chains.
See, they had this crazy idea that they'd make a cryptocurrency that they could sell to western digital, who could offer hard drives that "filled themselves up" with other people's data when idle. WD would obv make a buck and maybe sell these drives for much cheaper than the component cost. I'm not exactly sure of the economics. I think the idea was to have half the drives be "receivers" and half be "senders" and actually sell the "senders" for way more than component cost, but provide trivial effort file backup.
I think they're still building it. I dunno if it'll be a scam or not. I had fun though.