Readit News logoReadit News
tpeo commented on Average annual hours worked per country   stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx... · Posted by u/ShadowFaxSam
betadreamer · 8 years ago
Keep in mind that this is showing the "reported" hours, which can be misleading. For example it shows that people in US works more than Japan but I know for a fact that people in Japan works A LOT more. However, since it is a cultural thing and they expect you to work long hours, no one reports overtime. I even heard that you can get fired if you report it.
tpeo · 8 years ago
Reported by whom? What do those quotes mean?
tpeo commented on Average annual hours worked per country   stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx... · Posted by u/ShadowFaxSam
hectormalot · 8 years ago
Also keep in mind that the numbers are not corrected for part-time vs full-time figures.

e.g. my country (the Netherlands) is listed as 1439 hours vs Mexico 2257 hours annually per worker. You might come to the conclusion that people in Mexico work must longer than in the Netherlands. However, only 17% of people in Mexico work part-time, vs 37% in the Netherlands. Countries with low participation of part-time workers therefore will look as if they are working much longer hours.

tpeo · 8 years ago
>Average annual hours worked is defined as the total number of hours actually worked per year divided by the average number of people in employment per year. Actual hours worked include regular work hours of full-time, part-time and part-year workers, paid and unpaid overtime, hours worked in additional jobs, and exclude time not worked because of public holidays, annual paid leave, own illness, injury and temporary disability, maternity leave, parental leave, schooling or training, slack work for technical or economic reasons, strike or labour dispute, bad weather, compensation leave and other reasons

https://data.oecd.org/emp/hours-worked.htm

tpeo commented on There's no limit to longevity, says study that revives human lifespan debate   nature.com/articles/d4158... · Posted by u/mrfusion
SketchySeaBeast · 8 years ago
It's a 50/50 change once 105, and given that the odds of 32 coin tosses all coming up heads is 1 in 4,294,967,296 does that mean there's a 137 year old person running around somewhere?
tpeo · 8 years ago
Probably not running, and probably not within our time. World population in 1881 was a couple of billion short of that.
tpeo commented on There's no limit to longevity, says study that revives human lifespan debate   nature.com/articles/d4158... · Posted by u/mrfusion
jkingsbery · 8 years ago
A 50% mortality rate per year translates into there being a <0.1% chance of living for 10 years. How does that translate into there being "no limit to longevity?" I seriously don't get the claim.
tpeo · 8 years ago
It means that mortality rate doesn't approach 100% around some given age, which would be the hypothetical biological limit. I don't see the issue.
tpeo commented on Software updates: the “unknown unknown” of the replication crisis   blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofs... · Posted by u/minikites
tpeo · 8 years ago
If the statistical significance of your results is algorithm-dependent, shouldn't they be regarded as suspect? Perhaps it might be just a failure of imagination on my part, but I find it odd to think that changing a software package might budge estimates far enough to push them outside the zone of statistical significance unless they were only marginally significant in the first place.
tpeo commented on The impossibility—and the necessity—of distinguishing science from nonscience   weeklystandard.com/daniel... · Posted by u/howsilly
tpeo · 8 years ago
>Popper’s idea that scientific theories must be falsifiable has long been an outdated philosophy. I am glad to hear this, as it’s a philosophy that nobody in science ever could have used . . . since ideas can always be modified or extended to match incoming evidence.

I don't know what is the context of this quote, but this sounds like a deep misrepresentation of Popper's position. As far as I know, he explicitly addresses the issue of ad hoc and auxiliary hypotheses. Unless this is part of a bigger point about some the "fine-tuning" of theories i.e. just how much the main proposition can be off the mark given the additional hypotheses.

tpeo commented on Hundreds of skulls reveal massive scale of human sacrifice in Aztec capital   sciencemag.org/news/2018/... · Posted by u/DanAndersen
DoreenMichele · 8 years ago
This article doesn't specifically mention cannibalism, but in my twenties I read a book that posited that "the lamb" of Christianity being a symbol of peace, as well as the Hindu reverence for the cow, were based on their ability to provide food security because they are grazers who are able to turn grass into protein. Grass is not a human food source. So this means they don't compete for the same food sources we do.

Aztecs had cook books full of recipes for things like "human ribs with hot peppers." Some old temples had bread fruit trees lining the avenue up to the temple. Bread fruit is another source of protein.

IIRC, the book posited that the Aztecs were cannibals because South America had no native animals like cows or sheep that fed predominantly on grass. Thus they were chronically short on protein and this helped make them a very war like people. If you are all going to die anyway because there is not enough food, dying in battle is both psychologically better for the culture and offers the chance that we win, we take we what we need and we feed our people.

Most wars are ultimately rooted in resource shortages. Real peace is ultimately rooted in problem solving to make sure there are enough resources to go around and that those resources get more or less equitably or "fairly" distributed, in some sense and to some degree. Society can survive economic inequality, but there comes a point past which economic inequality is too much of a hardship on some groups and this routinely goes bad places.

Edit: I confess to being an Ugly American who has a bad habit of lumping South America and Central America together and not making clear distinctions in that regards. Substitute "the lands of the Aztecs" for South America.

tpeo · 8 years ago
I'd say that lambs are more associated with docility than with peace, and it's a very fair association to anyone who has ever had any contact with sheep. Animal symbolism seems to have much more to do with animal traits, animal behavior or supposed animal behavior (e.g. strength with bulls, courage with lions and altruism with the pelican) than anything else and I see no reason to break that pattern. Furthermore, if it were the case that the reverence of some animals were due to degree is which they are useful, compared to the degree to which they are removed from preferred human ecological niches, then the most revered animals on the earth should probably have been fish.
tpeo commented on Life Is More Than Compounding Money   intelligentfanatics.com/l... · Posted by u/IntelligentFan
tpeo · 8 years ago
There is more to life than smiling and talking to people on a daily basis.
tpeo commented on Aristo – A system that reads, learns, and reasons about science   aristo-demo.allenai.org... · Posted by u/nmstoker
ASalazarMX · 8 years ago
This is almost philosophical:

Question: What happens when we die?

Aristo is not sure about this one...

Aristo's best guess: the weeds die but the bean plants do not.

Confidence: 17.29%

tpeo · 8 years ago
I'm not sure if 'philosophical' is the right word, but I'm sure there's a haiku in there.
tpeo commented on Google Is Pushed to Tie Executive Pay to Progress on Diversity   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/cwperkins
anon12345690 · 8 years ago
how can you say that you dont think interest exists but if it does then its definitely not biological?
tpeo · 8 years ago
Supposing there's a 1955 Cadillac Series 62 Coupe in the middle of Antartica, which most likely there isn't, it didn't fall there from space.

I have no particular stakes on this discussion besides this one, I just dropped by to say this: I don't see any problem with the construction of that statement. At least as an informal or "folk" logic argument.

u/tpeo

KarmaCake day924April 17, 2014View Original