Readit News logoReadit News
throwdour commented on Tech elites leaving San Francisco threaten Silicon Valley's supremacy   businessinsider.com/tech-... · Posted by u/jacksonpollock
cactus2093 · 5 years ago
You're not wrong that many people do seem to prefer the petty crime to tech.

But you seem to be condoning that preference, and that preference is ridiculous. An economic boom should not be a bad thing. And tech is not raising rents, it is raising housing demand which could easily be met with a corresponding rise in supply that would limit the price increases, but new housing has been being actively blocked for decades.

You also leave out an important factor, most of the city that is supporting the policies that enable petty crime here have no skin in the game. They live in nice neighborhoods where they've owned their houses for decades making them massively wealthy and don't have to interact with the undesirables. It's easy to look the other way and ignore the downtown problems of homelessness and street crime, and to be so woke that you don't want any crime prosecuted, when it doesn't affect you.

throwdour · 5 years ago
"An economic boom should not be a bad thing"

You're right, but the reality is it has been a bad thing for many people. As long as they're being outmaneuvered by homeowners and landlords, having the boom simply end would work just as well as winning the housing supply fight. Few people are going to miss tech elites if they leave.

throwdour commented on Tech elites leaving San Francisco threaten Silicon Valley's supremacy   businessinsider.com/tech-... · Posted by u/jacksonpollock
eeZah7Ux · 5 years ago
> I can also see why developers might have been reluctant to bet too big on new construction

Why would that be?

throwdour · 5 years ago
Because if "tech elites" actually are leaving, then the increase in demand will have been proven to be transient

Surely many developers would have made the bet anyway, at least in 2010-2019, but going forward it'll be worth considering whether building housing for people who are likely to leave en masse is worth the risk.

Deleted Comment

throwdour commented on Tech elites leaving San Francisco threaten Silicon Valley's supremacy   businessinsider.com/tech-... · Posted by u/jacksonpollock
shuckles · 5 years ago
Rich people don't want to live in your 100 year old apartment with 50 year old finishes. Unfortunately, in San Francisco, they don't have any other choice.
throwdour · 5 years ago
That, I agree with. San Francisco should have built more housing to accommodate the growth. Though if people are leaving already, I can also see why developers might have been reluctant to bet too big on new construction.
throwdour commented on Tech elites leaving San Francisco threaten Silicon Valley's supremacy   businessinsider.com/tech-... · Posted by u/jacksonpollock
seibelj · 5 years ago
Guy drives past in a lambo vs. screaming person pooping on sidewalk after shooting up. It’s a tough call!
throwdour · 5 years ago
Maybe it is a tough call, because the guy shitting on the sidewalk isn't living in your previous apartment at twice the price.
throwdour commented on Tech elites leaving San Francisco threaten Silicon Valley's supremacy   businessinsider.com/tech-... · Posted by u/jacksonpollock
tharne · 5 years ago
This is what happens when a city neglects basic quality of life issues, and allows petty crime to thrive. It happened to New York in the 1970's and took roughly three decades to recover from. Good luck, San Francisco.
throwdour · 5 years ago
I think many people prefer petty crime to tech elites. With the upward pressure on rents over the last 10 years, even having your bike stolen every few weeks is cheaper than getting evicted and/or having to find a market rate dwelling.

Of course, it's better to have neither exploding costs nor petty crime, but at the end of the day, dealing with petty crime is more affordable.

EDIT: Getting downvoted to oblivion but I'm not wrong.

https://sf.curbed.com/2019/12/12/21001080/san-francisco-sf-r...

"In 2010, a two-bedroom SF apartment on Craigslist averaged $2,893 (per historic data compiled in 2016 by Eric Fischer), or $3,396 after inflation. At the end of 2019, similar units on the same site sit at a median of $4,300, up 26.6 percent."

It would have taken a lot of petty crime to amount to that $12K per year in inflation-adjusted (i.e. real) increase.

throwdour commented on Why I Love Tailwind   mxstbr.com/thoughts/tailw... · Posted by u/0xedb
chmod775 · 5 years ago
That example also encapsulates everything that wrong with how CSS is used today.

The markup contains no information about what the contents are anymore, so you lose the ability to target anything that is X: for example an email, an avatar within a 'people-card' etc.

HTML/CSS was supposed to separate content from looks. Of course that ship has sailed long ago, since modern day development seems to be insistent and mushing HTML, CSS and JS together in the same file. Looks is logic is content is looks is a mess.

HTML/CSS was also supposed to be re-usable. Now instead the re-usability is within react/angular/etc. components, so you now have to use react and javascript everywhere you want to show similar elements - if you want to have the ability to easily change them later.

Of course this isn't the point. If you have the ability to work with react components, you probably are knowledgeable enough to use CSS.

So the only remaining use-case is "way for non-technical people to write objectively bad HTML and have it look nice".

Which again, is fine. Sometimes bad is good enough when the alternative is nothing at all.

I'm still not a fan.

throwdour · 5 years ago
If you're working on the content and the looks at the same time, and you don't 100% know where the project is going, it's helpful to consider them as a combined unit, so you can alter and/or discard that unit without delving into separate CSS and HTML trees. (Or, worse, not being sure what HTML or CSS you should alter or throw away when its corresponding CSS or HTML ends up in the garbage).

Separate content and presentation is a great final outcome, but when a project is in flux as it's being built, it's a burden.

EDIT: Moreover, it's not just that the "ship has sailed long ago"; the ship was attacked and sunk. Frameworks that combine CSS and HTML aren't doing so out of neglect; they're aggressively rejecting the separate looks/content paradigm.

Deleted Comment

throwdour commented on South Africa's lottery probed as 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 drawn   bbc.co.uk/news/world-afri... · Posted by u/EwanToo
neom · 5 years ago
I'm so curious what the chances of this happening are.
throwdour · 5 years ago
Isn't the real question "what are the odds of the lottery being random if this suspicious sequence comes up so soon"? I.e. given a specific sequence, how many weeks should you expect to wait before you see it? In the extreme if you would expect to see 1,2,3,4,5,6 after 500,000 weeks, but you see it in the first week, then probably the lottery is not random, right?
throwdour commented on Google Poly is shutting down   support.google.com/poly/a... · Posted by u/tti
SystemOut · 5 years ago
They have a real problem finding developers that will want to work on it. You don't get promoted at Google for maintaining a product that isn't growing.
throwdour · 5 years ago
It's strange that getting promoted is such a universal goal. Many or most people who start on the promotion ladder get stuck in the miserable middle. There's surprisingly little reflection on whether or not the extra money is worth the extra hassle, or at what point one should avoid further promotion.

u/throwdour

KarmaCake day18November 26, 2020View Original