Dead Comment
This, though. This one makes me angry and disappointed.
Twitter has had such a solid brand for so long. It's accomplished things most marketers only dream of: getting a verb like "Tweet" into the standard lexicon is like the pinnacle of branding. Even with all of the issues, "Twitter" and its "Tweets" have been at the core of international discourse for a decade now.
Throwing all of that away so Elon can use a domain he's sat on since '99 seems exceedingly foolish.
"Twitter was acquired by X Corp both to ensure freedom of speech and as an accelerant for X, the everything app. This is not simply a company renaming itself, but doing the same thing.
The Twitter name made sense when it was just 140 character messages going back and forth – like birds tweeting – but now you can post almost anything, including several hours of video.
In the months to come, we will add comprehensive communications and the ability to conduct your entire financial world. The Twitter name does not make sense in that context, so we must bid adieu to the bird."
Maybe I'm in a bubble, IG seems very low text, low drama, low politics. Not very Twitter-y
With Slack, for example, you have so much fine grained control. I don't know if it makes sense to implement a blanket "shut off communications after hours" policy
I don't think spez cares if this happens. 95% of the content people see on reddit is mindless garbage that is either a repost or from tiktok/some other site. I believe spez is confident that 95% of content will continue on just fine even if every single moderator quit at the same time. Automoderator setups are already very well fine tuned.
You'd lose the more curated subreddits, sure. But that's such a tiny amount of traffic compared to propaganda news posts, animal photos, and tiktok videos.
It drives me bonkers and I tell people off but somehow it still happens.
I think direct conversations online is turning people into junkies of the now.
I actually day dreamed about going back to emails sometimes last week... Then I woke up when the notification bell went off.
4 to 8 meetings a day.
100+ emails
Teams and slack constantly going off
Yet I'm still supposed to produce actual quality code as well.
It's like trying to work in a mosh pit
Trust in software will continue to erode until software stops treating end users and their data and resources (e.g. network connections) as the vendor's own playground. Local on-device data shouldn't be leaking out of radio interfaces unexpectedly, period. There should be a user intent tied to any feature where local data is sent out to the network.
So why didn't Apple just simply ask for user permission to enable this feature? My cynical opinion is because Apple knows some portion of users would instantly disallow this if prompted, but they feel they know better than those users. I don't like this attitude, and I suspect it is the same reason why there is an increasing discontent growing towards opt-out telemetry, too.
* Bulletproof
* Privacy Conscious
* Normal (recommended)
That way users are roughly opting in and opting out in a way that aligns with their desires