Don’t go to the gym to feel good or meet with friends, don’t do yoga. Well do yoga, but only for the muscle recovery.
For good measure he posts a picture of his swollen muscles to prove he isn’t fucking around. He’s one of the good ones.
Don’t go to the gym to feel good or meet with friends, don’t do yoga. Well do yoga, but only for the muscle recovery.
For good measure he posts a picture of his swollen muscles to prove he isn’t fucking around. He’s one of the good ones.
This statement is not entirely accurate. It is possible for a US social media company to operate in mainland China, provided it complies with local regulations, including hosting its servers in China and adhering to censorship requirements. For instance, LinkedIn operated in China until August 2023. However, it may ultimately prove unfeasible due to factors such as user preferences, the volume of censorship requests, or even perceived unfair competition. Since at least 2010, when Google faced demands for compliance with Chinese censorship regulations, the requirements for foreign companies to operate in China have been clearly outlined.
No comment on these policies, but it is undeniable that businesses operating in foreign markets must comply with local laws. However, by intervening in business activities, undermining corporate property rights, and contradicting its own stated principles of free market economics and international trade rules, the U.S. has demonstrated economic nationalism. I can't tell who is playing defect in this case.
x86 already was on its way towards such a goal.
(Speaking of both Claude Code and the desktop app, both Sonnet and Opus >=4, on the Max plan.)