Readit News logoReadit News
streblo commented on Intel CEO Letter to Employees   morethanmoore.substack.co... · Posted by u/fancy_pantser
streblo · 8 months ago
Intel missed GPUs, missed ARM, missed ASICs, missed everything right under their nose for the last 15 years. This from Andy Grove's "Only the Paranoid Survive" company, a company that in it's own past pivoted from commoditized RAM production to become the one that won the CPU race, a company perfectly positioned to win the next big cycle as the dominant leader in the industry.

This is what happens when the MBAs and the bean counters take over. They cut the fat, then they slice right through the muscle and bone.

streblo commented on Embedding Python in Elixir, it's fine   dashbit.co/blog/running-p... · Posted by u/arathunku
paradox460 · a year ago
I feel like you can write some variant of this comment every few years and just add the previous "best" to the front of the stack of things it's better than.
streblo · a year ago
You're not wrong, this is the nth iteration of python tools that try to solve all the problems of what came before, including whatever the n-1th iteration introduced.

That said, in my personal experience with uv, it solves nearly all of the problems I've come across that were created by other python package management tools. It seems to have been very thoughtfully designed and I think there's a strong chance it'll become the standard, and that there won't need to be more standards after this. We'll see!

streblo commented on Embedding Python in Elixir, it's fine   dashbit.co/blog/running-p... · Posted by u/arathunku
ch4s3 · a year ago
Mix is also so much better than anything python has to offer in terms of build/dependency tooling.
streblo · a year ago
uv for Python is a game changer, better than anything else out there and solves a lot of the core problems with pip/venv/poetry/pyenv (the list goes on).
streblo commented on Amazon tells employees to return to office five days a week   cnbc.com/2024/09/16/amazo... · Posted by u/jbredeche
dividefuel · a year ago
I don't think revenge is the motivation, but it's hard to know what the actual motivation is. I think it's some mix of:

- Execs truly believe that culture and productivity are better in office (i.e., what they actually say in their announcements)

- An opportunity to force attrition without layoffs

- Maintain real estate value / Justify real estate investments

- Belief that remote workers are more likely to jump to another company

- Opportunity to claw back a perk that can be returned in future negotiations if needed

- Big tech companies are mature and no longer need to compete so heavily on brand/perks

- Execs personally prefer employees in office for some other reason (e.g., wanting to feel powerful)

- Execs have strong data that productivity is higher in an office (seems unlikely, surely they'd have published it by now)

streblo · a year ago
> - Execs truly believe that culture and productivity are better in office (i.e., what they actually say in their announcements)

I think this is the reason, but its more nuanced than this. Management finds in-office employees easier to manage. They are more likely to attend meetings, participate in team communication, give status updates, etc. There's much less of a question around "is this person doing the work" if you can see them doing something that looks like work in the office. If you are blocked or are blocking someone, it's a tap on the shoulder instead of sending a message into the ether.

Management of remote employees is a huge information gathering exercise - very little of the above information is proactively surfaced to you, and instead you have to go looking for it. Frankly, it's just a lot more work for managers.

I realize the above may not be fair to employees, or that the perceptions of managers accurately resemble the truth - just stating what I think is going on.

streblo commented on Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content   politico.com/news/2024/08... · Posted by u/southernplaces7
kjkjadksj · 2 years ago
Its not a question of who is better at managing money but more who needs benefit in our society. The government supports welfare programs. Someone throwing 100m in the market does not unless they are taxed to do so.
streblo · 2 years ago
The government also supports bombing the living fuck out of people on the other side of the world. Similarly, someone throwing 100m in the market does not unless they are taxed to do so.
streblo commented on Jane Street raked in $4.4B at start of 2024   ft.com/content/7bdd0bc1-5... · Posted by u/bblcla
streblo · 2 years ago
Am I correct in understanding how firms like Jane Street work? They are a market maker - they run an exchange where buyers and sellers can transact. They can arbitrage these trades by connecting buyers and sellers where there is a price discrepancy. Something like that?
streblo commented on Cancer under age 50 increased 80% from 1990 to 2019   bmjoncology.bmj.com/conte... · Posted by u/mizzao
streblo · 2 years ago
Citation needed. The paper specifically says:

> Dietary risk factors (diet high in red meat, low in fruits, high in sodium and low in milk, etc), alcohol consumption and tobacco use are the main risk factors underlying early-onset cancers.

u/streblo

KarmaCake day1315December 9, 2007
About
a lurker
View Original