Readit News logoReadit News
stoltzmann commented on F-35 pilot held 50-minute airborne conference call with engineers before crash   cnn.com/2025/08/27/us/ala... · Posted by u/Michelangelo11
mytailorisrich · 3 days ago
"Modern" jet fighters, yes. I believe it started to be "hard" to fly manually with the F-16 and now it is completely impossible, but feel free to correct me.
stoltzmann · 3 days ago
F-16 was the first inherently unstable jet fighter, and the first one that featured a full fly-by-wire system with no backup. If you want a jet that is completely impossible to fly without a computer, F-16 is already one of them - there is nothing special with the F-35 about that.
stoltzmann commented on Prison isn’t set up for today’s tech so we have to do legal work the old way   prisonjournalismproject.o... · Posted by u/danso
nujabe · 5 days ago
I bet you think Ulbricht did something wrong too.
stoltzmann · 5 days ago
Well, he did facilitate drug trade. I wouldn't call that "not doing anything wrong".

Whether you believe it's morally right or wrong, that doesn't matter - he did violate several high profile laws.

stoltzmann commented on The F-35 is losing the trade war   jalopnik.com/1945910/f-35... · Posted by u/rntn
cpursley · 7 days ago
How can a jet protect ground assets in the age of hypersonic weapons systems and drones? Anyways, isn't that the job of ground air defense?
stoltzmann · 7 days ago
By for example destroying the enemy launch platforms. By intercepting enemy flights that would deploy those weapons. And specifically in case of F-35s, also by providing ELINT.

"Hypersonic" weapons used in current conflicts are nothing more than a glorified long range missiles that are useless if you can't launch them from the air. They're also currently statistically not significant due to their low amounts.

stoltzmann commented on Secure Boot, TPM and Anti-Cheat Engines   andrewmoore.ca/blog/post/... · Posted by u/gm678
eurleif · 13 days ago
The problem with "you don't need to outrun the bear, only to outrun your friend" is that either you or your friend are going to get eaten. All other things being equal, it would be preferable to have a strategy where no one gets eaten.
stoltzmann · 12 days ago
Both me and my friend are playing on the community server where the cheaters are banned, neither of us are getting eaten.
stoltzmann commented on Secure Boot, TPM and Anti-Cheat Engines   andrewmoore.ca/blog/post/... · Posted by u/gm678
kbolino · 13 days ago
Well, some of them are smart enough not to immediately log back in and spam "I'm the guy you just banned! Ban me again!" in global chat. And the admins, even paid ones working for big corporations, have finite patience and time.

Detecting cheating is not always trivial. Cheat bans often have to happen in waves rather than immediately in order to frustrate the cheaters and obfuscate how they were detected.

Sure, the cheater will eventually run out of IPs. But you might as well save both yourself and the cheaters some time and hassle and just add 0.0.0.0/0 and [::]/0 to your IP banlist right now. You will effectively end up with the same result if you're willing to chase every cheater across the address spectrum.

Spot IP bans aren't totally worthless but they're probably the least effective of the techniques I mentioned.

stoltzmann · 12 days ago
>And the admins, even paid ones working for big corporations, have finite patience and time.

We're talking community servers here, not corporate ones.

>Sure, the cheater will eventually run out of IPs. But you might as well save both yourself and the cheaters some time and hassle and just add 0.0.0.0/0 and [::]/0 to your IP banlist right now. You will effectively end up with the same result if you're willing to chase every cheater across the address spectrum.

It's not going to end up with 0/0 as the final result. You're assuming that almost any address is available to the cheaters, but that's simply not true. By blocking datacenter IP ranges and Tor exit nodes, you've stopped most of the ways cheaters can easily change their IPs.

You ban their own home IP address, and what are their options? 1. They get a VPN and don't make it through because that IP is already blocked. 2. They hope their ISP allocates a random IP from a range, so if that works they come back and they instead get a range ban. 3. They get a residential VPN and start burning through those precious IPs.

You don't have to chase cheaters if you're running a server. You ban them once or twice and call it a day.

stoltzmann commented on Secure Boot, TPM and Anti-Cheat Engines   andrewmoore.ca/blog/post/... · Posted by u/gm678
ohdeargodno · 13 days ago
>There's only a limited amount of IPs available to cheaters, it won't be long before they burn through all of them.

No ? Even if it takes 5 minutes to get noticed (which only happens on the most absolutely blatant cases of cheating), rotating through a few VPNs can easily get you a few thousand different IPs. That's over three consecutive days of cheating. And that's just for a single server. In addition, IP bans means that you potentially nuke hundreds of people: between CGNAT & people playing on shared phone connections, a single IP can be allocated many times.

In addition: this kind of maintenance wears down server owners and admins. Every times, it's more time spent banning someone. Every time, it's players on the server making reports while you're not there, and hoping you have tools that allow you to verify it. Every time, it's players leaving your community, because there's a cheater.

stoltzmann · 12 days ago
>rotating through a few VPNs can easily get you a few thousand different IPs

It's not uncommon to ban all addresses coming from a datacenter, which will stop the majority of VPNs. That leaves significantly fewer addresses from residential VPNs.

>IP bans means that you potentially nuke hundreds of people: between CGNAT & people playing on shared phone connections, a single IP can be allocated many times

Yep. That's collateral damage. A good server would have an appeals process to handle those cases.

stoltzmann commented on Secure Boot, TPM and Anti-Cheat Engines   andrewmoore.ca/blog/post/... · Posted by u/gm678
kbolino · 13 days ago
> The solution existed starting in the late 90s through the early 2010s [...] the cheater gets banned.

This attitude also reflects the naivete of the 1990s. You can't ban a person. You can ban an IP, you can ban "all known Tor exit nodes" or "all known VPNs" or "all known public cloud IPs", you can ban whole countries by IPgeo, you can ban anything somebody has to provide to log in (an email address, a phone number, a credit card number, etc.), but these can all be evaded. The only truly effective banning tools are private, invite-only servers or reputation/incentive systems where the cheater loses something really valuable that a ban evasion can't recover.

stoltzmann · 13 days ago
>but these can all be evaded

And then they'll be banned again and again. There's only a limited amount of IPs available to cheaters, it won't be long before they burn through all of them.

stoltzmann commented on OpenSSH Post-Quantum Cryptography   openssh.com/pq.html... · Posted by u/throw0101d
stoltzmann · 19 days ago
So which one is better? sntrup761x25519-sha512 or mlkem768x25519-sha256?
stoltzmann commented on Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip   jeffgeerling.com/blog/202... · Posted by u/ingve
turnsout · 2 months ago
I’m a TrueNAS/FreeNAS user, currently running an ECC system. The traditional wisdom is that ECC is a must-have for ZFS. What do you think? Is this outdated?
stoltzmann · 2 months ago
That traditional wisdom is wrong. ECC is a must-have for any computer. The only reason people think ECC is mandatory for ZFS is because it exposes errors due to inherent checksumming and most other filesystems don't, even if they suffer from the same problems.
stoltzmann commented on Next month, saved passwords will no longer be in Microsoft’s Authenticator app   cnet.com/tech/microsoft-w... · Posted by u/ColinWright
Brian_K_White · 2 months ago
Everyone else: don't do this
stoltzmann · 2 months ago
Why not? It actually sounds like the best way to use passkeys and still have control over them.

u/stoltzmann

KarmaCake day206April 7, 2022View Original