What does "real" mean here?
It means two people of different races can have a baby together, but two people of the same sex cannot.
Readit Newsstanfordkid commented on More women than expected are genetically men (2016) novonordiskfonden.dk/en/n... · Posted by u/pavel_lishin
stanfordkid commented on I know genomes and I didn’t delete my data from 23andMe stevensalzberg.substack.c... · Posted by u/bookofjoe
This a bone headed article… umm we can’t extract anything from it about your health (*now)… so might as well just spread it everywhere?
Like he doesn’t even go into the fact that it could be used by law enforcement wrongfully etc: e.g Unregulated Chinese crime detection startup buys the data, you happen to be in China and get arrested bc they used inadequate algorithms that wrongfully accused you.
There is absolutely nothing convincing here.
Deleted Comment
The answer is to work with your bank to block payments. Equity is a legal contract, it's not going to evaporate because Carta says so. Carta isn't going to hire a debt collector against a well funded startup and get counter-sued / risk the bad PR.
> turn towards qualitative methods and epistemologies that are either misaligned with or explicitly reject the scientific method.
At least you can see their questionable method upfront, and can disagree with it.
Economics is worse: it has become completely quantitative, with sophisticated mathematics. I’ve heard the approach referred to as ‘physics envy’
It appears unapproachable to a non-expert and authoritative. But it’s not like physics
It’s conclusions are often catastrophically wrong because all the mathematics relies on shaky qualitative assumptions: people are perfectly rational, etc.
For example we have published economic research that forecasts that severe climate change will only damage global GDP by 1%.
They conclude that farming productivity will be reduced by 25% and farming is 4% of global GDP, so it’s 1%. Then they model some effect on the consumer because food prices go up.
It does not occur to the authors to model impact of physical result of that, which is, famine and political instability that comes with it.
This is the great illustration of the hokey thinking that happens in economics. They don't focus on modeling humans as agentic systems. What happens if GDP is pushed to 1000%, 10,000%? When there is so much agricultural production that food is free? How does that affect geopolitics, human social values and demands? It's clear to me the models completely breakdown and are really only epsilon valid (e.g okay for modeling small, but not catastrophic pertrubations)
Deleted Comment
Is back propagation really an idea applicable to the Nobel prize in physics? I mean certainly a Turing award is warranted. But back propagation or neural networks don’t really tell us anything about how the universe works. It’s an efficient optimization algorithm for a really powerful class of models.
You are assuming the court isn't a political thing that is trying to get him regardless of evidence. The court is at least partially political, and Netanyahu will tell you this is entirely political and he wouldn't get a fair trail.
There is indeed, as you state, political influence being exerted on courts. Most of that influence is in support of Israel and Netanyahu — do you really think there is significant political power and influence upon the ICC from Palestine or Hamas? Look at the amount AIPAC has contributed to pro-Israel politicians. It’s quite frankly absurd such a political organization exists under the guise of representing American Jews yet pretty much lobbies solely for Israeli geopolitical issues. Kennedy even tried to get it to register as a foreign agent. The fact that these warrants were issued despite the influence and leverage of Israel is a hint at how egregious the crimes are.
Deleted Comment
I have a friend who would say anytime someone brings up that "it's a complex issue": "They should just stop stealing peoples houses dude". This pretty much sums it up. Maybe if they stopped that a few decades ago this wouldn't have happened.