Can confirm :)
> ...we do already pay for resources that are provisioned by our K8S clusters
Customers are charged for worker nodes, but until this point, the control plane ("master") nodes have been free. In addition to the raw compute costs for those nodes, there's the SRE overhead for managing, upgrading, and securing them.
> ...but I generally assumed that that cost was amortized out
<googlehat>I'm not really sure.</googlehat> <civilian>My guess would be that, initially, this was the case. However, over time, people have created many zero-node clusters. Now the amortization isn't. Again, pure speculation.</civilian>
> But, isn't that quotas are for?
See my comment above about zero-node clusters.
> I have a new $73/mo. fee attached to my account (which, is not the end of the world) is that this really comes out of left field...
Acknowledge, but I do want to highlight that changes take place a few months from now (June 2020), not immediately. Furthermore, each billing account gets one zonal cluster with no management fee.
> Is this the precursor to you all discontinuing GKE because, as the DevRel class likes to tweet, nobody should be using Kubernetes if they can use (more expensive) services like Cloud Run?
100% no. Also, Cloud Run is almost always cheaper than running a Kubernetes cluster.
> Are we about to get Oracled?
I'm not sure what you mean by that verb.
You could have grandfathered in current deployments but - nope. In the tech world this is up there with killing Google Reader.
Because that isn't how these companies work.
Technology companies need an "ombudsman" - a contact that customers can go to when the normal tech support processes have failed.
The Ombudsman must not be part of the technology companies ordinary support processes, it must be entirely separate, and have highest level authority to demand action within the company.
To avoid the Ombudsman being overused, you could give it a price of say $20, which is always refunded when the case is resolved.
HN constantly has front page posts from people for whom big tech companies have support processes have failed but there is simply no other recourse unless you have "a friend in the business".
It just doesn't work to have some random Cloudflare person offer their email address as some post disaster issue resolution process on social media. Formalise it with an official Ombudsman and maybe then companies like Cloudflare might avoid HN front page bad publicity.
I had an issue at "one of the biggest tech companies" that went on for days and days in which tech support kept telling me I had set up something wrong, until eventually I emailed one of the top managers who I happen to "know" at that company - it was fixed within hours. That "contact a friend in the business who can actually get things done" is a necessary part of a large support organisation and it simply does not exist yet in any tech company that I know of.
It's worth mentioning that NRK and Norway has taken inspiration from BBC since the dawn of television, including the licensing system (which has just been replaced by a fixed tax).
No internet, instead it used fibre optic cable to create a switched video network, which could be used to watch normal cable tv channels, or connect the user to a dedicated remote laserdisc player.
While such systems never got wide-spread deployments, it's interesting to consider how the media landscape would have changed if we had gone that route.
Source, A promotional/technical video from the time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1AiM1S8MGk
I wish I kept the earlier stuff from my Amiga days.
https://techcrunch.com/2008/12/30/md5-collision-creates-rogu...