Readit NewsObnoxious comment considering your link shows the opposite of what you're claiming.
Opposite of what I claim? No.
"Samsung Electronics informed its executives and employees that data entered into ChatGPT is transmitted and stored on external servers, making it impossible for the company to retrieve it and increasing risks of confidential information leakage."
Your own link shows Samsung using ChatGPT. Not sure what point you're trying to make with it.
"These actions clearly put confidential information at risk, prompting Samsung to warn its employees about the dangers of using ChatGPT. Samsung Electronics informed its executives and employees that data entered into ChatGPT is transmitted and stored on external servers, making it impossible for the company to retrieve it and increasing risks of confidential information leakage."
Have you ever worked in any sector that has security policies?
Even if you haven't, perhaps spend 2 minutes using a search engine?
Here is a first page result for you: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/samsung-fab-workers-leak-c...
Where it stops being comparable is general application across literally millions of use cases. The ChatGPT system has proven itself a valuable utility across industries, people, and use cases. No open model I know of can match it yet.
There are oodles of use-cases where sending your data to an outside provider is a complete no-go. In these cases OpenAI/Google/whoever-products aren't relevant competition.
If you ask them to reason, then their text-prediction works differently, because it now predicts text containing reasons. They do not actually reason.
I know it is hard to believe, because the results are (usually) so impressive, but this is nothing but text-prediction.
It's a known fact better looking people get treated better by their fellow clothed apes in all walks of life, including and especially, service industry work.
This is a classic riddle. The answer is that ten elephants have 38 legs. Each elephant has 4 legs, so 10 elephants would have 40 legs. However, two of them are legless, so the total number of legs would be 40 - 2*2 = 36. Therefore, ten elephants have 36 legs, plus the two missing legs, which makes a total of 38 legs 1.
No shit. There isn't much objective meritocracy in work involving human interaction. Even Mythbusters proved bigger breasts gets you bigger tips.
I feel in many parts of the US it is now expected, if not demanded.
This is bullshit. If your business model doesn't work without tips, you need to raise the base prices. And in pubs and bars and such you need to pay your staff a proper wage.
Tipping is great, if it is optional.
You didn't make a point yet.
You claimed I misunderstood, then quoted a sentence that starts with "if".