imo, if pip's preference is to ship broken functionality, then what is/is not shipped with pip is not meaningful.
imo, if pip's preference is to ship broken functionality, then what is/is not shipped with pip is not meaningful.
If somebody has more information about this topic, please share it.
Maybe they shouldn't be? And I think honest people can have that debate.
But you can't really argue against the effectiveness of government subsidy as a path to prosperity for the guy getting the money.
Deleted Comment
Back then it felt like a bit of a club, one that forms around a common hobby. Nowadays it feels more like the "community" of a high-school graduation class. Sure there is community there, but its mostly one of folks randomly thrown together into classrooms.
Folks like Raymond Hettinger would today be totally drowned out in the listicle-style attention seeking times.
> in the web world
I would put that more broadly though, it was web, data-science, there was a point when it became the universal scripting language, and part of me kind of hoped that the crowd would move to nodejs for all of it, so that Python can become more peaceful again. But I guess there is no going back, we went from dinghi to cruise ship, and when the crowd leaves, it will just be a deserted cruise ship.
What does it do better than other languages? The article mentions features that sound like parity with other modern languages, but nothing that stands out.
0. https://ztresearch.blog/2014/07/03/unique-image-showing-ligh...