Okay, but why
on 6 lines of trivial example code? Of all the things to make proprietary...
Not having this statement results in a compile time error in solidity.
Readit Newssali0 commented on Compiler Bug Causes Compiler Bug: How a 12-Year-Old G++ Bug Took Down Solidity osec.io/blog/2025-08-11-c... · Posted by u/luu
sali0 commented on Women dating safety app 'Tea' breached, users' IDs posted to 4chan 404media.co/women-dating-... · Posted by u/gloxkiqcza
> Wouldn’t it make more sense for a service to exist, like some kind of enforcement service provided by the government, where others can report safety concerns and that service goes and does something about it legally?
I think this is called "the police"
No it's called sarcasm
sali0 commented on GitHub CI/CD observability with OpenTelemetry step by step guide signoz.io/blog/cicd-obser... · Posted by u/ankit01-oss
Ops type here, Otel is great but if your metrics are not there, please fix that. In particular, consider just import prometheus_client and going from there.
Prometheus is bog easy to run, Grafana understands it and anything involving alerting/monitoring from logs is bad idea for future you, I PROMISE YOU, PLEASE DON'T!
Thank you, this is where I'll likely start.
From other comments as well, seems it's still worth trying to integrate otel. Appreciate everyone's insights
sali0 commented on GitHub CI/CD observability with OpenTelemetry step by step guide signoz.io/blog/cicd-obser... · Posted by u/ankit01-oss
noob question, i'm currently adding telemetry to my backend.
I was at first implementing otel throughout my api, but ran into some minor headaches and a lot of boilerplate. I shopped a bit around and saw that Sentry has a lot of nice integrations everywhere, and seems to have all the same features (metrics, traces, error reporting). I'm considering just using Sentry for both backend and frontend and other pieces as well.
Curious if anyone has thoughts on this. Assuming Sentry can fulfill our requirements, the only thing taht really concerns me is vendor-lockin. But I'm wondering other people's thoughts
sali0 commented on Next.js 15.1 is unusable outside of Vercel omarabid.com/nextjs-verce... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
> Next and RSCs have become some of the most frustrating things I've worked with on frontend
What is frustrating about RSCs? They work really well for me and I'm still using Next.js only because of RSCs.
It's fine if you know them well. The unclarity in boundaries between client and server components, and the unintentional complexity that brings, is just frustrating to work with. I will gladly take a CSA any day.
But don't let a random internet stranger detract you. If it works for you, go for it.
sali0 commented on Next.js 15.1 is unusable outside of Vercel omarabid.com/nextjs-verce... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
Next and RSCs have become some of the most frustrating things I've worked with on frontend. Dealing with FE is already annoying enough, but having to wrestle the magic of Next and then vendor lock-in to Vercel to top it off.
Team is trying out Tanstack router + vite this week. Excited to build a regular ass CSA.
sali0 commented on Self-hosted x86 back end is now default in debug mode ziglang.org/devlog/2025/#... · Posted by u/brson
As far as I know, Zig has a bunch of things in the works for a better development experience. Almost every day there's something being worked on - like https://github.com/ziglang/zig/pull/24124 just now. I know that Zig had some plans in the past to also work on hot code swapping. At this rate of development, I wouldn't be surprised if hot code swapping was functional within a year on x86_64.
The biggest pain point I personally have with Zig right now is the speed of `comptime` - The compiler has a lot of work to do here, and running a brainF** DSL at compile-time is pretty slow (speaking from experience - it was a really funny experiment). Will we have improvements to this section of the compiler any time soon?
Overall I'm really hyped for these new backends that Zig is introducing. Can't wait to make my own URCL (https://github.com/ModPunchtree/URCL) backend for Zig. ;)
URCL is sending me down a rabbithole. Haven't looked super deeply yet, but the most hilarious timeline would be that an IR built for Minecraft becomes a viable compilation target for languages.
This kind of simple game feels like it would be perfect to remain web/PWA based, what benefits do you foresee in a native mobile version?
Would be nice to pop it up on the phone via an app. PWA would also be nice.
But main reason is so he can monetize. Would gladly pay a few dollars for this.
I love this, spent more time on it than i thought i would. You should make this into a native mobile game.
sali0 commented on MCP is the coming of Web 2.0 2.0 anildash.com//2025/05/20/... · Posted by u/freediver
MCP is not an open standard.
People routinely mistake "protocol specification uploaded to GitHub, PRs welcome" as open standards. They are not. Calling them "open protocols" because they are open source, not open standards (no standards body was involved in the making of this protocol!) is essentially a form of openwashing.
This has been happening way too frequently lately (see also: ATProto), and it really needs to be called out.
Partially agree. But I can't help thinking this is the natural lifecycle of protocols. They first start as open projects, proliferate as such, and evolve into standards with governance once they catch on.
What would you call these projects? Open protocols?