Readit News logoReadit News
stackskipton commented on Another GitHub outage in the same day   githubstatus.com/incident... · Posted by u/Nezteb
noodlesUK · 18 hours ago
It's also completely unloved. Even MSFT Azure's own documentation regularly treats it as a second class citizen to GitHub. I have no idea why they don't just deprecate the service and officially feature freeze it.

Honestly that's the case with a lot of Azure services though.

stackskipton · 16 hours ago
Someone mentioned the boards but Pipelines/Actions are not 100% compliant.

My company uses Azure DevOps for a few things and any attempt to convert to GitHub was quickly abandoned after we spent 3 hours trying to get some Action working.

However, all usability quarks aside, I actually prefer these days since Microsoft doesn't really touch it and it just sits in corner doing what I need.

stackskipton commented on Pg-dev-container is a ready-to-run VS Code development container for PostgreSQL   github.com/jnidzwetzki/pg... · Posted by u/mariuz
taftster · 16 hours ago
Honest question. Do you recommend a "devcontainer" for this? Like a Docker image that maybe has both postgres and your development environment preinstalled inside? Or do you generally like to use and reference an external docker container instance (with postgres installed) and connect to it from your devcontainer instance?
stackskipton · 16 hours ago
I tend to use dev containers with docker compose.

So if I'm building Python application with Prometheus/RabbitMQ/PostGres that's used as part of my application, My docker compose has network, those 3 services + Python Dev Container and I just reference the hostname of the service in my Python application config (ENV VARS).

stackskipton commented on Pg-dev-container is a ready-to-run VS Code development container for PostgreSQL   github.com/jnidzwetzki/pg... · Posted by u/mariuz
stackskipton · 18 hours ago
To help out everyone else, this is designed for those working on PostgreSQL development. For anyone who is just using PostGres as part of their application, use normal PostGreSQL container.
stackskipton commented on Irish man with valid US work permit held in ICE detention for five months   theguardian.com/us-news/2... · Posted by u/n1b0m
ryan_j_naughton · 19 hours ago
Yes, I am 100% certain of what I said. These individuals have had valid visas in the US and been here for 10-20 years and intentionally have never become green card holders.

One was on a student visa for undergrad and then a student visa for masters for 6 years total (4 for undergrad and 2 for masters), then on a G4 diplomatic visa while working at the World Bank for 5 years, then back to a student visa for 5 years pursuing a PhD, then back to a G4 Diplomatic visa for 6 years while working at the World Bank. This person married an American about 10 years ago and still never pursued a green card out of choice.

Another was on a G4 diplomatic visa while working at the IDB for 3 years, then a student visa for 5 years while pursuing a PhD, then a visa while working at the Federal Reserve for a number of years (not sure of which, but either H1B or J1), and then on a G4 diplomatic visa while working at the IMF.

Of course, these are not your typical situations for the average immigrant. Admittedly, I live in a bit of a bubble surrounded by economists in Washington DC from the World Bank, IMF, IDB, etc who are mostly on G4 diplomatic visas.

My point is it is still possible and one shouldn't presume.

stackskipton · 18 hours ago
So basically you played "Well Ackwually" card when you knew that path is not available to 99.9% of immigrants.

You can presume when you read the article and realize he was working in blue collar trade so your experience does not apply.

EDIT: And they would likely transition to Green Cards the second that their work visas expired.

stackskipton commented on Irish man with valid US work permit held in ICE detention for five months   theguardian.com/us-news/2... · Posted by u/n1b0m
ActorNightly · 19 hours ago
If someones potential illegal presence justifies ICE to massively overstep any legal due process and break laws, then by definition you are ok if somehow Democrates took over the DHS when they got in power, and used the premise of anti-domestic terrorism to illegally detain any person associated with MAGA for any reason and let them starve/die in prison.
stackskipton · 19 hours ago
No but is ICE 100% breaking the law or just norms? Immigration law is such a mess and key reason we are here. For past 30 years, a lot of immigration "law" has been Executive Branch keeping a broken system going by just going with vibes. Now we have Executive Branch deciding to 100% change the vibes and system is coming apart in real time.

Reading over court filings, there is collision between two laws. First one is, "Those who marry US Citizens can get Green Card regardless of previous US Immigration violations."

Second one is, VWP admits have no rights. If US decides to deport you, out you go with no further discussion.

Biggest takeaway of Trump immigration actions is Congress has fucked up so bad letting system get to this point.

stackskipton commented on Irish man with valid US work permit held in ICE detention for five months   theguardian.com/us-news/2... · Posted by u/n1b0m
ryan_j_naughton · 19 hours ago
> The article is extremely light on details but fact he doesn't have a Green Card/Lawful Permanent Resident yet would indicate that at some point of his time in United States, he was illegally present, probably for a while.

That is absolutely false. I know many people who have lived legally in the USA for many many years with valid visas and have intentionally never pursued a green card. Two people come to mind including one who has over 20 years the US on valid visas -- she intentionally never pursued the green card despite both (a) being married to an American and (b) being legally able to get the green card.

Some of them are now pursuing green cards only because of federal government's immigration enforcement not only going after illegal immigrants or criminals but clearly and intentionally pursing immigrants in general -- even those who are legal and without any criminal history.

stackskipton · 19 hours ago
From my understanding on this issue, spouses of US citizens are handed a green card after paperwork is shuffled, there is no pursuing it.

When discussing this with friends, multiple spouses have pulled out green cards and only newly weds had anything else but green card. She showed her passport with some form attached to it.

Also, I did dig up the court filings: https://habeasdockets.org/media/documents/71921787/004_18103...

Yes, he was here unlawfully (Admitted as tourist and overstayed) for a period but due to his marriage, he on path to Green Card.

stackskipton commented on Irish man with valid US work permit held in ICE detention for five months   theguardian.com/us-news/2... · Posted by u/n1b0m
pavlov · 19 hours ago
> “at some point of his time in United States, he was illegally present, probably for a while”

How do you conclude that from the facts in the article?

stackskipton · 19 hours ago
Having dealt with US Immigration law, if you are legally present for 20 years, it's extremely difficult not to transition to GC/Citizenship since work visas in United States generally have a limit and any immigration lawyer would have been clear "Either move to GC or you are going home."

Also, despite all the US screaming about "They took our jobs" with immigrants, the US doesn't really hand out work visas all that much and don't really hand it out to blue collar labors at all.

There is a possibility that he's been on legal visa entire time but I'd give extremely good odds that he wasn't. The fact his immigration lawyer doesn't mention it is very telling.

stackskipton commented on Irish man with valid US work permit held in ICE detention for five months   theguardian.com/us-news/2... · Posted by u/n1b0m
medion · 20 hours ago
Even with some co-mingling of facts, is 5 months detention still proportionate? That’s the crux of it.
stackskipton · 20 hours ago
My opinion is probably not but this is ultimately a political conversation.

The article is extremely light on details but fact he doesn't have a Green Card/Lawful Permanent Resident yet would indicate that at some point of his time in United States, he was illegally present, probably for a while.

Sure, he's on path, MAYBE (that's up to immigration courts), to legal status but he's not quite there yet and it's one of those "Are we going to forgive past transgressions?"

stackskipton commented on Irish man detained by ICE for 5 months   rte.ie/news/ireland/2026/... · Posted by u/cauliflower99
jshier · 20 hours ago
The nuances of criminal procedure may not apply, but the fundamental constitutional rights still do, as well as human rights. Indeterminate detention violates both.
stackskipton · 20 hours ago
Indeterminate detention without end goal violates the law. However, my guess is process is moving along, just extremely slowly.
stackskipton commented on Irish man detained by ICE for 5 months   rte.ie/news/ireland/2026/... · Posted by u/cauliflower99
idle_zealot · 20 hours ago
A law cannot overturn the Constitution, you need an Amendment for that. In principle, anyway. If you have a Supreme Court that abdicates its duties then you can do whatever you want, at the cost of legitimacy.
stackskipton · 20 hours ago
According to Congress and blessed by Supreme Court, immigration law is civil, not criminal and therefore all criminal due process law does not apply.

It's been that way for over 40 years so yes, according to Congress/SCOTUS, this is legal.

u/stackskipton

KarmaCake day2929October 12, 2023View Original