Readit News logoReadit News
s1k3 commented on Ask HN: Is it appropriate to ask a startup to let me see their cap table?    · Posted by u/golly_ned
atdrummond · 2 years ago
This is silly. You can literal export a high level view and change VC names to “VC #1” and employees to “Individual #1” and still easily relay the info that the employee needs. I don’t buy the privacy or security arguments.
s1k3 · 2 years ago
The range in equity grants can still cause problems. The reality is exposing this information only works against you and limits your ability to negotiate with employees if you know it will be exposed to others.

I disagree completely.

That being said I believe company’s and founders should be as transparent as possible but sometimes that can come at a price and so it’s not ideal to be completely forthcoming.

s1k3 commented on Ask HN: Is it appropriate to ask a startup to let me see their cap table?    · Posted by u/golly_ned
908B64B197 · 2 years ago
You can always ask.

Their level of secrecy should tell you how serious they are. If they are too opaque, my advice would be to switch to a mostly cash comp.

s1k3 · 2 years ago
The cap table can have sensitive information on it that might compromise employees and or investors or the founders themselves.

I don’t think being secretive about the exact details of the cap table is indicative of anything.

They should be able to tell you broadly how many shares there are and how valuable your equity grant is tho.

s1k3 commented on Where have all the laid-off tech workers gone?   economist.com/business/20... · Posted by u/rcarmo
Eisenstein · 2 years ago
> John Deere, an American tractor-maker, has been snapping up fired tech workers to help it make smarter farm machinery.

Oh yay. Who wants to work for a company that is actively antagonistic against its own customer base?

s1k3 · 2 years ago
Do you see the irony in your question yet? =P
s1k3 commented on TikTok Congress Hearing   nytimes.com/2023/03/23/te... · Posted by u/tapanjk
stronglikedan · 2 years ago
That demo would just learn to sideload their apps.
s1k3 · 2 years ago
Most people don’t even know what sideloading is, but more importantly it would kill the value of tik tok because the population would be gone and therefor the audience and the money.
s1k3 commented on U.S. home prices are the most unaffordable they've been in nearly 100 years   longtermtrends.net/home-p... · Posted by u/mennaali
dalyons · 2 years ago
Yeah I think the HN crowd is vastly overestimating how much people care about rates. Most people are not perfect financial optimizers - they’ll just pay whatever they can maximally afford per month for a house that most closely matches what they need for their present life. Few people are coldly rate rational. You only have to look at what people pay for car loans to confirm this.
s1k3 · 2 years ago
It’s not about optimizing it’s about cash flow. If you get a 500k mortgage today at the current rate of ~7% your monthly payment is about 3500/mo. That same mortgage financed 2 years ago around ~2% is a monthly payment of 1800. For the SAME house you are paying basically double the amount per month. This isn’t optimizing a few bucks per month it’s about not being able to afford the same house.

Every homeowner knows this and if they’ve ever had the incling to move int rh last year theyve done the math and realize it simply doesn’t make sense. People won’t move right now unless life forces them to.

s1k3 commented on U.S. home prices are the most unaffordable they've been in nearly 100 years   longtermtrends.net/home-p... · Posted by u/mennaali
switch007 · 2 years ago
Interest rates jumping from 1.2% to 4.5% had zero cooling effect on house prices in my area. Probably quite a few people are still on existing fixed mortgages.

Prices have jumped, as a double whammy.

It’s all about supply: there is very very little and it’s a desirable area.

Even if rates stay at around 4-5% in a few years when all of the low-rate fixed mortgages have ended, prices will have risen, and I would guess all that would happen is a slight abatement of rises, not a reduction.

s1k3 · 2 years ago
When the interest rate goes up that fast existing homeowners are less inclined to sell because their monthly payments will go way up buying a comparable house elsewhere. So you end up reducing supply when it happens so fast and so much.
s1k3 commented on TikTok Congress Hearing   nytimes.com/2023/03/23/te... · Posted by u/tapanjk
causi · 2 years ago
Too little too late. TikTok is embedded in the culture now. They could've banned it four years ago when all these privacy concerns were first making headlines but now that half the population uses it every day there's no chance in hell.
s1k3 · 2 years ago
I mean, they could do it. But it would be wildly unpopular among that demo.
s1k3 commented on Who becomes an entrepreneur? Insights from research studies   generalist.com/briefing/w... · Posted by u/bhavansri
dagorenouf · 2 years ago
I left a 6 figure engineering job to build my own startup with my wife. For the past 5 years, we spent 2/3rds of our savings on it and almost didn’t take vacation. This year we finally reached ramen profitability.

When I look at where we would be if I had kept the job, we would be homeowners, be able to buy new clothes regularly, go to restaurants and take awesome vacations a few times a year.

But the missing thing would be autonomy. The reason why I’m willing to sacrifice so much is because i fundamentally don’t like having to follow orders from a boss or manager. I’m arrogant enough to think i know better, and want to prove it by actually building my own thing.

Regardless of how silly it sounds on a financial level, the calculation makes sense once we look at the sense of ownership and autonomy over our own work. It’s worth more to me than any money I could make.

Ps: if you’re curious, the startup is logology.co

s1k3 · 2 years ago
I literally just wasted so much money on a logo. Coulda used this post last week.
s1k3 commented on Amazon to lay off 9,000 more workers after earlier cuts   cnbc.com/2023/03/20/amazo... · Posted by u/mfiguiere
kypro · 2 years ago
I don't know how many of you relate, but a personal level this last few years has left me quite shaken.

In 2021 I remember thinking how tech really proved its worth by so quickly assisting our economies through the pandemic with e-commerce, video conferencing and work from home.

Sure, things felt a bit crazy, but I remember thinking how lucky I was to land in tech as a career and that it was hard to see a future any time soon where the world wouldn't value tech workers highly.

Skip to today and I'm honestly wondering how long I have.

We've had a massive influx of new tech talent over the last few years and now we see this dramatic turnaround in hiring which will likely make it significantly harder to get a good tech job in the near future.

And in addition to this we have tools like GPT potentially disrupting our careers on a timescale best viewed on the scale of months.

It doesn't help that I'm going through a lot in my personal life at the moment too, but I've never felt so vulnerable about what the future holds.

I guess I should just be grateful that we had a good run while it lasted, but it's hard to think like that when people depend on you to have things figured out.

Anyway, I hope everyone involved in these layoffs lands on their feet.

s1k3 · 2 years ago
If you are talented you will have no problem keeping or landing a new job. The people that have trouble maintaining employment are the ones that are not very good. Tech is about as close to a meritocracy as there is in the US.

There is of course a lot of nepotism and politics but generally if you have talent you will be employed. There is simply too much demand for talented tech people.

The large layoffs are not good but they are course correcting and these companies are still actively hiring despite the billboard layoff announcements.

s1k3 commented on Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says   bbc.com/news/health-64987... · Posted by u/tosh
soperj · 2 years ago
Somehow all the studies end up being on jewish kids in Isreal vs. jewish kids in England. Not exactly a representative sample of people across the globe. The studies themselves have all the hallmarks of shit science, but everyone on here seems to agree with it because it fits their world view.
s1k3 · 2 years ago
Well the opposite view isn’t really based on science , only in faulty risk mitigation. So is it riskier to let your kid go without knowing for a long time or is it better to test in a limited controlled window where you can react and adapt if something goes wrong.

u/s1k3

KarmaCake day302May 27, 2022View Original