Most likely a promotional from the looks of it. I myself stumbled over it a about a year ago, when someone posted it on an IRC channel.
Later at 6:45 they show more people testing them
Most likely a promotional from the looks of it. I myself stumbled over it a about a year ago, when someone posted it on an IRC channel.
Later at 6:45 they show more people testing them
Milk can help in regions with dietary low calories, but is mediocre or bad for fat US citizens.
I also found the food shown very misleading.
The problem is the same, the relative concentration of oxygen in air is less than 0.05% (~450pars per million). In water much less.
Recent article: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/nov/28/africa-f...
So the benchmark is achieving human-like intelligence on a 100W budget. I'd be very curious to see what can be achieved by AI targeting that power budget.
A computer uses orders of magnitude less energy than a human.
It's all about the task, humans are specialized too.
EDIT: maybe add a logarithm or other non-linear functions to make the gap even bigger.
https://dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_are...
So yes, you use it to write the paper but soon it is public knowledge anyway.
I am not sure if there is much to learn from the draft of the authors.